Re: [flexcoders] Re: FDS and licensing issues

2007-02-23 Thread Chaitanya Mutyala

thanks jayson

but my system uses and requires multiple CPU machines.

-Chaitanya

On 2/22/07, Jayson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  This is copied right from the Adobe download page for Flex and FDS

Flex Data Services 2 Express
A powerful solution for creating data-intensive rich applications.
The Express edition is a free, non-expiring commercial-use product
for applications deployed on a single machine with no more than one
CPU.

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com,
chaitanya raja
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hmm.. I guess you could classify this as a rant. Anyways, here it
goes.

 Could someone please suggest what i could do.
 Consider, I am a small software firm and I create a product which i
 sell to different companies. I think Flex and FDS provides me a
really
 good implementation of part of my product. There are other options
 available for the functionality, but I do like Flex. But then
again,
 should i pay the huge sum that FDS costs me for every sale I make? I
 think this is not fair.

 This is my understanding of the licnesing for FDS. Let me know if
its
 not so. Also do let me know if I have any other alternative
licensing
 options available for FDS.

 Regards,
 Chaitanya


 



Re: [flexcoders] Re: FDS and licensing issues

2007-02-23 Thread Chris Allen

Chaitanya,

Depending on what you are doing with FDS you could more than likely use Red5
in its place. Red5 is now supporting AMF3 with remoting and RTMP sockets. It
also does video and audio streaming, which FDS doesn't do. We have been
building a few applications using Flex2 and Red5, and so far things have
been going well. One thing to keep in mind though, is that Red5 is still
pretty new and still under heavy development. At any rate, you way want to
look into it as it's an open source solution.

I'm one of the leads of the project so of course I'm coming at this with a
bias. Just want to clarify that before some people jump all over me for
suggesting Red5.

Best of luck.

-Chris

On 2/23/07, Chaitanya Mutyala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  thanks jayson

but my system uses and requires multiple CPU machines.

-Chaitanya


On 2/22/07, Jayson [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

   This is copied right from the Adobe download page for Flex and FDS

 Flex Data Services 2 Express
 A powerful solution for creating data-intensive rich applications.
 The Express edition is a free, non-expiring commercial-use product
 for applications deployed on a single machine with no more than one
 CPU.

 --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com,
 chaitanya raja
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hmm.. I guess you could classify this as a rant. Anyways, here it
 goes.
 
  Could someone please suggest what i could do.
  Consider, I am a small software firm and I create a product which i
  sell to different companies. I think Flex and FDS provides me a
 really
  good implementation of part of my product. There are other options
  available for the functionality, but I do like Flex. But then
 again,
  should i pay the huge sum that FDS costs me for every sale I make? I
  think this is not fair.
 
  This is my understanding of the licnesing for FDS. Let me know if
 its
  not so. Also do let me know if I have any other alternative
 licensing
  options available for FDS.
 
  Regards,
  Chaitanya
 


 



[flexcoders] Re: FDS and licensing issues

2007-02-22 Thread Jayson
This is copied right from the Adobe download page for Flex and FDS

Flex Data Services 2 Express
A powerful solution for creating data-intensive rich applications. 
The Express edition is a free, non-expiring commercial-use product 
for applications deployed on a single machine with no more than one 
CPU.



--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, chaitanya raja 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hmm.. I guess you could classify this as a rant. Anyways, here it 
goes.
 
 Could someone please suggest what i could do. 
 Consider, I am a small software firm and I create a product which i
 sell to different companies. I think Flex and FDS provides me a 
really
 good implementation of part of my product. There are other options
 available  for the functionality, but I do like Flex. But then 
again,
 should i pay the huge sum that FDS costs me for every sale I make? I
 think this is not fair. 
 
 This is my understanding of the licnesing for FDS. Let me know if 
its
 not so. Also do let me know if I have any other alternative 
licensing
 options available for FDS.
 
 Regards,
 Chaitanya