On Monday 26 Nov 2007, Douglas McCarroll wrote:
This is obviously an important question. Going beyond one CPU takes us
from free to lots of money. What will free handle? I've been
My guess is that it works out cheaper to buy a faster single CPU than to
upgrade the LCDS license.
--
Tom
I have a question related to this topic as well. What has peoples experience
been with open source solutions like AMFPHP for remoting, or Python for
persistent socket connections? These have always been my methods of choice,
and have done me no harm as of yet, but I am working on a project that
Well, yes, but this approach will only take us so far... even with Moore's
law in action.
Does anyone have a significant app running on LCDS Express? How many
simultaneous users can it support? With what CPU?
Douglas
On Nov 27, 2007 9:00 AM, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 26
I'd like to repeat Steven's question. I'm really curious about this.
How many simultaneous connections can LCDS handle on one CPU? I
realize that this will vary a great deal, depending on the application
and the CPU, but it would be great to get a ballpark idea.
Anatole - you suggested, I would
Is there anyway to judge what level of user connections a given server can
handle without requiring specialized loadsharing strategies? In a non-audio
or video environment what's it take to stream an AS3 based swfs to 3-5 dozen
connections?
On 10/16/07, Anatole Tartakovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That part is not AMF specific - and Apache or Tomcat will have no issues of
doing it - that is purely bandwidth issue.
As far as AMF/RTMP streaming main issue is robustness. It is very easy to
get any of the products to run on the reliable network. We do use
OpenAMF and proprietary performance
PS - I did something that Granite didn't think was possible (or at
least very easy to do):
I got Granite Data Services working with Flex making remote AMF3/rpc
calls to a JSF Web Application. There were numerous potential issues
involved in this (faces context, phases, lifecycle), but I was
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yeah, I'm using HTTPService right now with E4X results. The for
large data
results, however, XML is not desirable.
I'd prefer to use some framework that uses AMF3 in order to get
more compact
results.
Bruce
Tom,
Thanks for your feed back on GDS. I have one question for you though. When I
ran the simple Pojo example, I saw in the output from my Tomcat server that
GDS was using AMF0, although it was supposed to be using AMF3. Do you know
why that is?
Thanks,
Bruce
On 10/16/07, tomeuchre [EMAIL
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom,
Thanks for your feed back on GDS. I have one question for you though.
When I
ran the simple Pojo example, I saw in the output from my Tomcat
server that
GDS was using AMF0, although it was supposed to be using
Thanks!
On 10/17/07, tomeuchre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com, Bruce
Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom,
Thanks for your feed back on GDS. I have one question for you though.
When I
ran the simple Pojo example, I saw in
You can also just use HTTPService to do direct HTTP requests. I am
using this for communications with a JAVA backend.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
All I want to do is have my Flex client to communicate with my Java
backend.
Due to
Yeah, I'm using HTTPService right now with E4X results. The for large data
results, however, XML is not desirable.
I'd prefer to use some framework that uses AMF3 in order to get more compact
results.
Bruce
On 10/16/07, Jeff Schuenke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can also just use
Bruce,
None of the options you have would work for serious production
application unless you invest heavily in making the client and server code
more reliable. Please keep in mind that once you go that route you are on
your own for data traffic robustness and performance.
I would try to see
Has the pricing been improved on LCDS? When I last looked into FDS it was
~20k EUR per CPU, which is just silly.
On 10/16/07, Anatole Tartakovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce,
None of the options you have would work for serious production
application unless you invest heavily in
15 matches
Mail list logo
