On Thursday 05 October 2006 18:46, boy_trike wrote:
I am not sure what you mean by NORMAL. Is there any performance hit by
having 6 cfc's in a component vs. 1?
No, but it's more hassle to manage.
Also the idea of an Object, in the OO sense, is to encapsulate all the
information about the
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 22:33, boy_trike wrote:
most of my components have 2- 6 cfc (ie. AddRecord, UpdateRecord,
DeleteRecord, ReadRecords). Each one has a unique function to call it and
a result handler. Is
Of
boy_trikeSent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 12:47 PMTo:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Re: How many cfs's
are TOO much
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com,
Tom Chiverton tom.chiverton@... wrote: On Wednesday
04 October 2006 22:33, boy_trike wrote: most of my components have
2- 6 cfc (ie
- Original Message -
From: boy_trike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 6:46 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: How many cfs's are TOO much
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wednesday 04 October
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 6:46 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: How many cfs's are TOO much
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 22:33, boy_trike wrote:
most of my components
5 matches
Mail list logo