[flexcoders] Re: Interfaces not working the way I understand anyway
Not necessarily, but then the app has been a bit.different from day one. In it most of the modules are discreet bits of functionality where the Main App simply organizes and hosts the other modules, which may in turn host other modules that the main app knows absolutely nothing about. Except now it seems pretty clear that if the main module REALLY knows nothing about any discreet piece, that piece might go walkabout at any time. Important safety tipwe live and learn. thx for all the help everyone! Mike --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Josh McDonald dzn...@... wrote: Just the interfaces, but your modules should be using interfaces defined (and used) in the main app anyway, no? -Josh
[flexcoders] Re: Interfaces not working the way I understand anyway
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Alex Harui aha...@... wrote: Sounds like an applicationDomain topology problem. See the modules presentation on my blog. Make sure the interface is linked into the main app. That got it! Thanks!! (maybe modules should be marked experimental or something)
[flexcoders] Re: Interfaces not working the way I understand anyway
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, mmormando m...@... wrote: --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Alex Harui aharui@ wrote: Sounds like an applicationDomain topology problem. See the modules presentation on my blog. Make sure the interface is linked into the main app. That got it! Thanks!! (maybe modules should be marked experimental or something) After seeing this, does it more or less mean that I need to statically link a copy of every stinking module I've got into my main module in order to be sure I won't run afoul of this problem every time I turn around? Not exactly sounding like an optimal solution.
Re: [flexcoders] Re: Interfaces not working the way I understand anyway
Just the interfaces, but your modules should be using interfaces defined (and used) in the main app anyway, no? -Josh 2009/1/16 mmormando m...@mormando.com --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, mmormando m...@... wrote: --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Alex Harui aharui@ wrote: Sounds like an applicationDomain topology problem. See the modules presentation on my blog. Make sure the interface is linked into the main app. That got it! Thanks!! (maybe modules should be marked experimental or something) After seeing this, does it more or less mean that I need to statically link a copy of every stinking module I've got into my main module in order to be sure I won't run afoul of this problem every time I turn around? Not exactly sounding like an optimal solution. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Alternative FAQ location: https://share.acrobat.com/adc/document.do?docid=942dbdc8-e469-446f-b4cf-1e62079f6847 Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups Links -- Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee. Like the cut of my jib? Check out my Flex blog! :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: j...@gfunk007.com :: http://flex.joshmcdonald.info/ :: http://twitter.com/sophistifunk
