On Thursday 18 January 2007 19:29, Matt Chotin wrote:
There is no technical requirement for FDS, we primarily thought we
weren't going to charge FDS customers *more* to add testing support for
now.
Ah, right, cheers for looking into this.
I can understand people who've plumbed for FDS not
@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Re: QTP plug in requires FDS?! That's crazy
Man, I've been so busy with work I'm struggling to stay connected with the
rest of the world, but my eye caught this subject as it's been something
we've been holding off on QA Automation for 1.5yrs now in lieu
: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rich Tretola
Sent: 18 January 2007 09:46
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: QTP plug in requires FDS?! That's crazy
Will it not run against FDS lite single cpu (Free)?
Rich
On 1/18/07, Matt Chotin [EMAIL
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 19:20, Tariq Ahmed wrote:
I know FDS being required wasn't done for the hell of it, but
architecturally it should have been an option that provides extra benefits,
You'd have thought so.
those who know me, I'm Flex's biggest fan. It feels like the Flex
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Chiverton
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 4:26 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: QTP plug in requires FDS?! That's crazy
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 19:20, Tariq Ahmed wrote:
I
: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Chotin
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:30 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: QTP plug in requires FDS?! That's crazy
There is no technical requirement for FDS, we primarily thought we
weren't
:-)
Matt
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tariq
Ahmed
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:21 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: QTP plug in requires FDS?! That's crazy
Man, I've been so busy
7 matches
Mail list logo
