I' read the same about the speed also, but aparrently the new webORB
3.0 has been made all fancy pants fast. WebORB claims it is 300%
faster.but I'm guessing that now it's as fast as AMFPHP.
Also the idea that a team of people are on it now. AMFPHP has been at
1.9 for something like
On 6-Jul-08, at 9:30 PM, Alan wrote:
I' read the same about the speed also, but aparrently the new webORB
3.0 has been made all fancy pants fast. WebORB claims it is 300%
faster.but I'm guessing that now it's as fast as AMFPHP.
Also the idea that a team of people are on it now.
I was told to use AMFPHP for this stuff. But Flex has it;s own
remoting gateway. What do I 'get' out of using AMFPHP?
In the past I used the HTTP service to call an XML file, or used the
Flex PHP application generator.
I just want to call a function in PHP, that runs a query and returns
Well what it depends on is what server side scripting language are you
using?
If it is PHP (As AMFPHP or WebOrb are designed for), you would have to
use one of those. Which is a preference, And I personally use AMFPHP.
The stuff that is built in is for CF, etc.
d
On 5-Jul-08, at 4:40
Thanks, I've been tinkering around with AMFPHP all yesterday some
today. I've checking out WebORB since this afternon.
So far I prefer WebORB. Mostly cause I'm new and the documentation is
insanely better. Plus the service browser for WebORB is tremendously
better, I can manger my MySQL
Yeah it does look better to the new person. Apparently amfphp is
faster from what I have read on the net(but maybe this gap is
closing?) for larger data sets.
I have found I can get an AMFPHP result with less code (from the
tutorials I looked at).
But it is all preference. I don't use
6 matches
Mail list logo
