be an issue.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Shen
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:15 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] coldfusion and Flex?
ROTECTED]>
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:39:10 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] coldfusion and Flex?
If you're using CF 7.02, the differences should be mimimal. The
services-config. xml filea now has things broken out into separate files,
so if you've
test things
out to be sure.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of markflex2007
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:22 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] coldfusion and Flex?
Hi,
I am working with CF7,Flex an
Hi,
I am working with CF7,Flex and Cairngorm.the application works fine.
My manager want to use CF8 now, I do not have idea what I have to
change from setting up project to Flex coding etc.
I need to know the steps before I switch cf7 to cf8.
Do you have experience for this.Please give me a hi
I have ran across this issue before and seem to have finally come across a
solution. The issue: say I have a CFC called Person which has a property
addressArray that is a array of Address CFCs. If the associated
Person.asobject has addressArray: ArrayCollection(); things don't
work, addressArray
I suppose it gives you the performance of "struct" and the advantadges of
typed/mapped objects
The properties of a CFC are NOT typed, thats the problem. We can type the
argument of a CF function, but not the property of a CFC... This means that
using properies is sensitive to errors.
Greetz Er
On Friday 24 November 2006 15:42, Rick Root wrote:
> Why write your own, non-optimized code, to have Coldfusion return an
> array of objects. Why not just return the query and let CF do the
> conversion.
Because dealing with an array of anonymous objects is a pain.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to c
I realize this discussion is all related to Cairngorn, and I don't use
Cairngorn or really know what it is... but here's a question.
If a CFC method returns a QUERY, then Coldfusion uses code optimized (in
theory by Adobe engineers) in the flex connector to convert the query
object to an array
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 17:21, Rick Schmitty wrote:
> Well yes, creating objects will always be more overhead, I should of
> asked: Does java and php show such drastic differences when making the
AFAIK, Java only does objects, and PHP only does non-objects (this is why PHP
has such bonkers
_
De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la
part de Dirk Eismann
Envoyé : jeudi 23 novembre 2006 10:29
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : RE: [flexcoders] ColdFusion and Flex Integration - up to 10x gain,
avoid cf object creation
Yes, I also noticed this.
I made a test
groups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] ColdFusion and Flex Integration - up
to 10x gain, avoid cf object creation
Some time ago i experienced with java versions of the value
objects. This also gives a significant improvement.
Greetz Erik
Hi,
I am trying to get the phone example working, I've been following the
instructions in " Coldfusion Powered Flex Phone Selector".
1. Using IIS and CFMX7 with 7.01 mystic updater installed.
2. The flex_enterprise-services.xml channel-definition has been
changed to:
http://localhost:{context
12 matches
Mail list logo
