Re: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?

2007-08-26 Thread Scott - FastLane

Alex -

No feathers ruffled at all... I just wanted to make it clear that I take 
the accuracy of the information very seriously.  My goal is to help 
others avoid the types of problems that I ran into.  When more accurate 
information becomes available I will be sure to update as appropriate.  
In the mean time, I will attempt to find time to write a simple 
application that demonstrates this issue clearly.  Glad you are planning 
to look into it too :)


Thanks
Scott

Alex Harui wrote:


Scott,
 
I don't doubt you saw what you saw, and everything you've posted could 
be true (naturally I hope it isn't cuz that'll mean we don't have a 
bug there).
 
My frustration comes from the following:
 
In your post you state that XMLListColleciton leaked less.  In theory, 
dumping e4x into a datagrid is the same as XMLLIstCollection since we 
just wrap the xml in a XMLListCollection.  You also state a 
theory that XMLListCollection convert xml to objects, which is 
misleading to post since it isn't quite true  These things make your 
whole post suspect.  You may in fact have some scenario where 
XMLListCollection behaves differently from straght e4x, but normally 
it shouldn't.
 
I often miss threads on FlexCoders since we're pretty busy and I was 
away for a couple of weeks, but did the memory leak aspect of this 
issue get discussed on this forum?  Is there a bug filed for this 
issue?  It might be in process and I haven't seen it yet.
 
Usually, these kinds of issues catch my attention.  I'm generally more 
than willing to squeeze some time out of my day to try to help with 
investigating things like this and love it when, once we figure out 
the issue, you post blog articles that help the community since it 
saves me time and makes one more person out there who can help others 
in similar situations.  However, I would much prefer to work with you 
before you post so we get the right information out there.  IMHO, 
memory usage is a trcky topic and easy to either misdiagnose, and/or 
offer up solutions/workarounds that either don't really work, or 
aren't optimal.
 
Sorry, if I ruffled feathers,

-Alex
 



*From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
*On Behalf Of *Scott - FastLane

*Sent:* Saturday, August 25, 2007 1:33 PM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?

Alex -

That is my posting, and I would hate for it to be "misinformation" in 
any way.  If your research turns up no evidence that I am correct then 
I will endeavor to re-create my problem in a sample application that I 
can send along to you for inspection.  If I cannot successfully 
demonstrate that binding to e4x is leaking memory I will be more than 
happy to withdraw my posting.  However, I should note, that I had a 
friend who was working on a similar application (datagrid bound 
directly to e4x)... knowing this I told him about my experiences.  He 
then added memory logging to his application.  Although his leak was 
less rapid than mine (he says with 1 minute refreshes he lost 1M or so 
per hour) he also saw the issue.  He then changed his application over 
to strongly typed objects and noted that his memory leak had also been 
resolved.  It was at this point that I decided to publish the post in 
case it might help others.


Scott

Alex Harui wrote:

I thought it was a performance issue only.  I do expect sealed 
classes to perform better than XMLLIstCollection (which does not 
convert to object). I'll have to investigate further.
 
Always frustrating when misinformation get out there...



*From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Tracy Spratt

*Sent:* Saturday, August 25, 2007 11:47 AM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?

I came across this article, wherein the author alleges that binding 
to e4x XML objects cause memory leaks:


http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14 <http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14>

His arguments / findings, seemed  well reasoned and supported, and I 
do not have the background to refute them.  Perhaps someone here 
might discuss this.


Tracy



*From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Alex Harui

*Sent:* Saturday, August 25, 2007 2:21 PM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks

There are two major memory usage scenarios in Flex.  One involves 
creating a new instance of a component, displaying, and later 
destroying it.  The other involves bringing in one or more classes of 
components in a module and trying to get rid of that module later 
when its classes are no longer needed.


Honestly, I

RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?

2007-08-25 Thread Alex Harui
Scott,
 
I don't doubt you saw what you saw, and everything you've posted could be true 
(naturally I hope it isn't cuz that'll mean we don't have a bug there).
 
My frustration comes from the following:
 
In your post you state that XMLListColleciton leaked less.  In theory, dumping 
e4x into a datagrid is the same as XMLLIstCollection since we just wrap the xml 
in a XMLListCollection.  You also state a theory that XMLListCollection convert 
xml to objects, which is misleading to post since it isn't quite true  These 
things make your whole post suspect.  You may in fact have some scenario where 
XMLListCollection behaves differently from straght e4x, but normally it 
shouldn't.
 
I often miss threads on FlexCoders since we're pretty busy and I was away for a 
couple of weeks, but did the memory leak aspect of this issue get discussed on 
this forum?  Is there a bug filed for this issue?  It might be in process and I 
haven't seen it yet.
 
Usually, these kinds of issues catch my attention.  I'm generally more than 
willing to squeeze some time out of my day to try to help with investigating 
things like this and love it when, once we figure out the issue, you post blog 
articles that help the community since it saves me time and makes one more 
person out there who can help others in similar situations.  However, I would 
much prefer to work with you before you post so we get the right information 
out there.  IMHO, memory usage is a trcky topic and easy to either misdiagnose, 
and/or offer up solutions/workarounds that either don't really work, or aren't 
optimal.
 
Sorry, if I ruffled feathers,
-Alex
 



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott - 
FastLane
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 1:33 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?



Alex - 

That is my posting, and I would hate for it to be "misinformation" in any way.  
If your research turns up no evidence that I am correct then I will endeavor to 
re-create my problem in a sample application that I can send along to you for 
inspection.  If I cannot successfully demonstrate that binding to e4x is 
leaking memory I will be more than happy to withdraw my posting.  However, I 
should note, that I had a friend who was working on a similar application 
(datagrid bound directly to e4x)... knowing this I told him about my 
experiences.  He then added memory logging to his application.  Although his 
leak was less rapid than mine (he says with 1 minute refreshes he lost 1M or so 
per hour) he also saw the issue.  He then changed his application over to 
strongly typed objects and noted that his memory leak had also been resolved.  
It was at this point that I decided to publish the post in case it might help 
others.

Scott

Alex Harui wrote: 



I thought it was a performance issue only.  I do expect sealed classes 
to perform better than XMLLIstCollection (which does not convert to object). 
I'll have to investigate further.
 
Always frustrating when misinformation get out there...



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Tracy Spratt
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 11:47 AM
    To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?





I came across this article, wherein the author alleges that binding to 
e4x XML objects cause memory leaks:

http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14 <http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14> 



His arguments / findings, seemed  well reasoned and supported, and I do 
not have the background to refute them.  Perhaps someone here might discuss 
this.



Tracy







From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Alex Harui
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 2:21 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks



There are two major memory usage scenarios in Flex.  One involves 
creating a new instance of a component, displaying, and later destroying it.  
The other involves bringing in one or more classes of components in a module 
and trying to get rid of that module later when its classes are no longer 
needed.



Honestly, I don't know of any issues of the first kind at this point.  
A major problem with ViewStack related components was addressed in Hotfix2, and 
a DateField issue was either addressed in the same hotfix, or a workaround was 
provided and the issue fixed for Moxie.  A recent issue with Menus was fixed 
for Moxie and a workaround was provided.  I'm sure there are still issues out 
there, and they should be filed as

Re: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?

2007-08-25 Thread Scott - FastLane

Alex -

That is my posting, and I would hate for it to be "misinformation" in 
any way.  If your research turns up no evidence that I am correct then I 
will endeavor to re-create my problem in a sample application that I can 
send along to you for inspection.  If I cannot successfully demonstrate 
that binding to e4x is leaking memory I will be more than happy to 
withdraw my posting.  However, I should note, that I had a friend who 
was working on a similar application (datagrid bound directly to e4x)... 
knowing this I told him about my experiences.  He then added memory 
logging to his application.  Although his leak was less rapid than mine 
(he says with 1 minute refreshes he lost 1M or so per hour) he also saw 
the issue.  He then changed his application over to strongly typed 
objects and noted that his memory leak had also been resolved.  It was 
at this point that I decided to publish the post in case it might help 
others.


Scott

Alex Harui wrote:


I thought it was a performance issue only.  I do expect sealed classes 
to perform better than XMLLIstCollection (which does not convert to 
object). I'll have to investigate further.
 
Always frustrating when misinformation get out there...



*From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
*On Behalf Of *Tracy Spratt

*Sent:* Saturday, August 25, 2007 11:47 AM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?

I came across this article, wherein the author alleges that binding to 
e4x XML objects cause memory leaks:


http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14 <http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14>

His arguments / findings, seemed  well reasoned and supported, and I 
do not have the background to refute them.  Perhaps someone here might 
discuss this.


Tracy



*From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
*On Behalf Of *Alex Harui

*Sent:* Saturday, August 25, 2007 2:21 PM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks

There are two major memory usage scenarios in Flex.  One involves 
creating a new instance of a component, displaying, and later 
destroying it.  The other involves bringing in one or more classes of 
components in a module and trying to get rid of that module later when 
its classes are no longer needed.


Honestly, I don't know of any issues of the first kind at this point.  
A major problem with ViewStack related components was addressed in 
Hotfix2, and a DateField issue was either addressed in the same 
hotfix, or a workaround was provided and the issue fixed for Moxie.  A 
recent issue with Menus was fixed for Moxie and a workaround was 
provided.  I'm sure there are still issues out there, and they should 
be filed as bugs so we can investigate and fix them.  I also encourage 
you to try to isolate problems of this nature and post examples on 
this forum as often there can be a misunderstanding of how memory 
management works in Flash/Flex.


The second kind of issues is sort of a fact-of-life for Flex.  The 
first module to introduce shared code via Styles or Managers must 
remain in memory to serve all other code.  This has been explained on 
my blog.http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui/2007/03/modules.html.  The blog 
article includes an example of a way to deal with this situation, 
although often the easiest way is just to include all managers in the 
main app, and bring in styles via runtime CSS.


As you'll see in the article, browser memory management has little to 
do with it.  It simply has to do with how GC works (described further 
elsewhere on my blog) and how styles and singleton managers are 
shared.  Any memory changes when minimizing is probably due to IE 
releasing its own browser resources, although the player may release 
some at that time as well.


If you have further questions, this forum should be able to help you 
out.  In the future, please ask sooner before you spend time creating 
eloborate infrastructures.


-Alex



*From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
*On Behalf Of *André Rodrigues Pena

*Sent:* Saturday, August 25, 2007 10:44 AM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* [flexcoders] Memory leaks

Hi all,

It might be a well-known that Flex has several memory issues. It 
doesn't completely free the memory of the components you add runtime, 
when you remove them from their containers, and when it comes to 
large-scale applications, this is a huge concern. The way my 
co-workers found to pass by it was to create a Javascript/Flex 
framework to allow Flex to load modules in separate HTML frames and 
provide communication between them. So, when a module gets out of 
scene, the browser frees the entire SWF. But this approach limi

RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?

2007-08-25 Thread Alex Harui
I thought it was a performance issue only.  I do expect sealed classes to 
perform better than XMLLIstCollection (which does not convert to object). I'll 
have to investigate further.
 
Always frustrating when misinformation get out there...



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy 
Spratt
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 11:47 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?



I came across this article, wherein the author alleges that binding to e4x XML 
objects cause memory leaks:

http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14 <http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14> 

His arguments / findings, seemed  well reasoned and supported, and I do not 
have the background to refute them.  Perhaps someone here might discuss this.

Tracy



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex 
Harui
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 2:21 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks

There are two major memory usage scenarios in Flex.  One involves creating a 
new instance of a component, displaying, and later destroying it.  The other 
involves bringing in one or more classes of components in a module and trying 
to get rid of that module later when its classes are no longer needed.

Honestly, I don't know of any issues of the first kind at this point.  A major 
problem with ViewStack related components was addressed in Hotfix2, and a 
DateField issue was either addressed in the same hotfix, or a workaround was 
provided and the issue fixed for Moxie.  A recent issue with Menus was fixed 
for Moxie and a workaround was provided.  I'm sure there are still issues out 
there, and they should be filed as bugs so we can investigate and fix them.  I 
also encourage you to try to isolate problems of this nature and post examples 
on this forum as often there can be a misunderstanding of how memory management 
works in Flash/Flex.

The second kind of issues is sort of a fact-of-life for Flex.  The first module 
to introduce shared code via Styles or Managers must remain in memory to serve 
all other code.  This has been explained on my 
blog.http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui/2007/03/modules.html.  The blog article 
includes an example of a way to deal with this situation, although often the 
easiest way is just to include all managers in the main app, and bring in 
styles via runtime CSS.

As you'll see in the article, browser memory management has little to do with 
it.  It simply has to do with how GC works (described further elsewhere on my 
blog) and how styles and singleton managers are shared.  Any memory changes 
when minimizing is probably due to IE releasing its own browser resources, 
although the player may release some at that time as well.

If you have further questions, this forum should be able to help you out.  In 
the future, please ask sooner before you spend time creating eloborate 
infrastructures.

-Alex



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of André 
Rodrigues Pena
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 10:44 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Memory leaks

Hi all,

It might be a well-known that Flex has several memory issues. It doesn't 
completely free the memory of the components you add runtime, when you remove 
them from their containers, and when it comes to large-scale applications, this 
is a huge concern. The way my co-workers found to pass by it was to create a 
Javascript/Flex framework to allow Flex to load modules in separate HTML frames 
and provide communication between them. So, when a module gets out of scene, 
the browser frees the entire SWF. But this approach limits the user interaction 
like drag-n-drop support between modules. It's not natural. 

It seems that the browser may have a great part of the blame. They realized, 
for instance, that Internet Explorer releases the memory when the window is 
minimized and FireFox doesn't.

I'm here to ask what else can be done regarding memory issues. And how you 
professionals have dealt with it. 

Thanks

-- 
André Rodrigues Pena 

 


RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?

2007-08-25 Thread Tracy Spratt
I came across this article, wherein the author alleges that binding to e4x XML 
objects cause memory leaks:

http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14

 

His arguments / findings, seemed  well reasoned and supported, and I do not 
have the background to refute them.  Perhaps someone here might discuss this.

 

Tracy

 



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex 
Harui
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 2:21 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks

 

There are two major memory usage scenarios in Flex.  One involves creating a 
new instance of a component, displaying, and later destroying it.  The other 
involves bringing in one or more classes of components in a module and trying 
to get rid of that module later when its classes are no longer needed.

 

Honestly, I don't know of any issues of the first kind at this point.  A major 
problem with ViewStack related components was addressed in Hotfix2, and a 
DateField issue was either addressed in the same hotfix, or a workaround was 
provided and the issue fixed for Moxie.  A recent issue with Menus was fixed 
for Moxie and a workaround was provided.  I'm sure there are still issues out 
there, and they should be filed as bugs so we can investigate and fix them.  I 
also encourage you to try to isolate problems of this nature and post examples 
on this forum as often there can be a misunderstanding of how memory management 
works in Flash/Flex.

 

The second kind of issues is sort of a fact-of-life for Flex.  The first module 
to introduce shared code via Styles or Managers must remain in memory to serve 
all other code.  This has been explained on my 
blog.http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui/2007/03/modules.html.  The blog article 
includes an example of a way to deal with this situation, although often the 
easiest way is just to include all managers in the main app, and bring in 
styles via runtime CSS.

 

As you'll see in the article, browser memory management has little to do with 
it.  It simply has to do with how GC works (described further elsewhere on my 
blog) and how styles and singleton managers are shared.  Any memory changes 
when minimizing is probably due to IE releasing its own browser resources, 
although the player may release some at that time as well.

 

If you have further questions, this forum should be able to help you out.  In 
the future, please ask sooner before you spend time creating eloborate 
infrastructures.

 

-Alex

 



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of André 
Rodrigues Pena
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 10:44 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Memory leaks

Hi all,

It might be a well-known that Flex has several memory issues. It doesn't 
completely free the memory of the components you add runtime, when you remove 
them from their containers, and when it comes to large-scale applications, this 
is a huge concern. The way my co-workers found to pass by it was to create a 
Javascript/Flex framework to allow Flex to load modules in separate HTML frames 
and provide communication between them. So, when a module gets out of scene, 
the browser frees the entire SWF. But this approach limits the user interaction 
like drag-n-drop support between modules. It's not natural. 

It seems that the browser may have a great part of the blame. They realized, 
for instance, that Internet Explorer releases the memory when the window is 
minimized and FireFox doesn't.

I'm here to ask what else can be done regarding memory issues. And how you 
professionals have dealt with it. 

Thanks

-- 
André Rodrigues Pena