Hi Gordon,
Is this a documented behaviour or just the current implementation?
Where can we find the documentation?
Cheers
Ralf.
On 2/9/07, Gordon Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't I read somewhere that the order you add listeners is the order
they get dispatched in as3 now?
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ralf Bokelberg
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 12:53 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Object.addEventListener vs.. adding them
inline via MXML
Hi Gordon,
Is this a documented behaviour or just the current implementation
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 9:58 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Cc: DL-Flash Player IMD
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Object.addEventListener vs.. adding them
inline via MXML
It should be documented, but I'm not sure that it is. I can't find it in
the ASDoc, for example, which doesn't
@yahoogroups.com
Cc: DL-Flash Player IMD
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Object.addEventListener vs.. adding them
inline via MXML
It should be documented, but I'm not sure that it is. I can't find it in
the ASDoc, for example, which doesn't seem to discuss the case of
registering multiple listeners for the same
:53 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Object.addEventListener vs.. adding them
inline via MXML
Nope, I think the second parameter must be a function, trying to pass an
array of functions should fail.
Also, just a note: it's better practice to not use the string
Yes that's possible, but semantically it is slightly different.
Inside the binding tag, the sequence of function calls is given by the
sequence in your code.
If you use mulitple addEventListener calls the sequence is not guaranteed.
Another possibility, which maintains the sequence, would be to
removing this listener would be tricky however.
On 2/8/07, Ralf Bokelberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes that's possible, but semantically it is slightly different.
Inside the binding tag, the sequence of function calls is given by the
sequence in your code.
If you use mulitple
Ralf,
That is an interesting approach.
I just have never had the need for something like that.. yet.
Didn't I read somewhere that the order you add listeners is the order they
get dispatched in as3 now? Plus you can use priorities.
PS From an OOP standpoint, I wouldn't do it , I would just
Yes Johannes Michael
I'm not using it either.
I just wanted to show what is possible.
Since i don't use code behind, i don't have this kind of problems anyways ;)
Cheers,
Ralf.
On 2/8/07, Michael Schmalle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralf,
That is an interesting approach.
I just have
: Object.addEventListener vs.. adding them
inline via MXML
Yes Johannes Michael
I'm not using it either.
I just wanted to show what is possible.
Since i don't use code behind, i don't have this kind of problems
anyways ;)
Cheers,
Ralf.
On 2/8/07, Michael Schmalle [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hey Doug,
Well, that's simple enough. Probably so simple, that I simply
overlooked doing it that way.
Real quick, would it be possible to also do it this way?
Object.addEventListener( click, [funct1, funct2, funct3] );
I know I could just try it, but from a methodology point of view, it
Object.addEventListener( click, [funct1, funct2, funct3] );
No,
1. as3 is strongly typed which means the method expects a function when it
is getting an array.
2. addEventListener wouldn't even know what to do with an array.
You could, if you had your own subclass override addEventListener to
Nope, I think the second parameter must be a function, trying to pass an
array of functions should fail.
Also, just a note: it's better practice to not use the string of the
event listener like click but rather the variable like
MouseEvent.CLICK. They really do the exact same thing in
could be renamed in a future release to something like mouseClick and
then your code wouldn't work.
Or even worse, you write cllck, and then for days even months, you think
your app isn't working or 'works' a certain way. Come to find out the event
wasn't even getting captured. :)
This is
Mike,
Looks like you're speaking from personal experience :)
From now on I'll make my custom components dispatch click and cilck
and cllck and clik etc etc. The google suggest approach to event
dispatching.
Doug
Michael Schmalle wrote:
could be renamed in a future release to something
15 matches
Mail list logo
