[flexcoders] Re: Interfaces WHY?

2008-10-11 Thread flexaustin
You lost me at hello! It's a lot easier if your class just implements what it needs and leave the inheritance to the class framework that is implementing the interfaces. Can you break this down a little? TIA --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Michael Schmalle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But

[flexcoders] Re: Interfaces WHY?

2008-10-10 Thread florian.salihovic
Polymorphism. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Ryan Gravener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pseudo multiple inheritance. Ryan Gravener http://twitter.com/ryangravener On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Richard Rodseth [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: And sometimes you even have interfaces with

[flexcoders] Re: Interfaces WHY?

2008-10-10 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, flexaustin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering if someone can explain why you would need an interface so short? INTERFACE: package my.package.area { /** * Interface for methods that evaluate an object and return a result.