I would like to add also mine personal opinion about the subject, as for
me it's really hot.
Here not everything was compared to everything other in scientific
approach, nonetheless I would give my vote to FLEX. IMHO.
I wouldn't bother on numbers but on usability. I am devoted to RTTY. My
point
...@lloyd.com
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Comparing Flex to K3 for contesting
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jack Haverty j...@3kitty.org wrote:
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 12:47 -0500, Drax Felton wrote:
Very interesting post. I
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 12:47 -0500, Drax Felton wrote:
Very interesting post. I wonder how the Flex compares against the almighty
Elecraft K3.
I've been contesting with the Flex-3000 for 18 months now, and like it a
lot. I haven't used a K3 in any contest, but the K3 certainly seems to
be
Excellent Jack! Well said and accurate without any rig emotion. I am a
content 5000 owner, but your points are spot on.
73 Ross K9COX
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Well said!!
Pete, NN9K
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Jack Haverty
Sent: November/14/2010 2:34 PM
To: Drax Felton
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Comparing Flex to K3 for contesting
there is.
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Jack Haverty
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 7:34 AM
To: Drax Felton
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Comparing Flex to K3 for contesting
On Sun, 2010-11-14
Interesting post. What it boils down to is user-interface and ergonomics,
not features.
This was my point exactly When comparing the Flex to the older IC-7800 and
FT-950 Paradigms...
There really needs to be a contest skin/interface for the Flex
It needs to integrate contest logging into
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 09:00 +1100, Laurie wrote:
I also have been using Flex for contesting (the 500A) as a single op
for
some time and find it to be a very capable contest radio once you
learn the
idiosyncrasies of setting it up with all the external
software/hardware.
It just occurred to
Jack,
Reading the thread on the focus issue, one suggestion is that most contest
stations that would use the Flex have atleast two screens, unless they use
an external aid, such as Bettie's controller or HotWheels to focus the
mouse, Windows has an option to have the focus on the window that
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 18:24 -0600, FlexRadio Support, Dudley Hurry
wrote:
Jack,
Reading the thread on the focus issue, one suggestion is that most
contest stations that would use the Flex have atleast two screens,
unless they use an external aid, such as Bettie's controller or
HotWheels
Once Deep Impact arrives and developers have the option of writing their
own gui (psdr console without all of the very complicated code), you
will see this as well as many other versions, for example, with digital
modes built in.
I am in the process of writing a logger (it's not feature complete
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 4:24 PM, FlexRadio Support, Dudley Hurry
supp...@flex-radio.com wrote:
Jack,
Reading the thread on the focus issue, one suggestion is that most contest
stations that would use the Flex have atleast two screens, unless they use
an external aid, such as Bettie's
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Dr. Howard S. White drpa...@kleega.comwrote:
Interesting post. What it boils down to is user-interface and ergonomics,
not features.
This was my point exactly When comparing the Flex to the older IC-7800
and FT-950 Paradigms...
There really needs to
, 911
From: br...@lloyd.com [mailto:br...@lloyd.com] On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 6:52 PM
To: Dr. Howard S. White
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Comparing Flex to K3 for contesting - It's not the
features it's the Interface
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010
14 matches
Mail list logo
