system.
Just thinking out loud.
73,
Peter NH6VB
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 22:19:28 -0500
From: tim.n9...@gmail.com
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
Peter et al,
Winmor is not intended to be a Pactor III replacement. It is designed to
have
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Peter Scheller nh...@msn.com wrote:
Tim,
I was rather thinking of connecting the output of the (my) SCS modem
to the Flex and have the best of both worlds.
Then do it. Tim provided you with the documentation to do it. It includes
the cable wiring diagram for
plan to retire after I
get the V/U in service.
-Tim
*From:* kq...@verizon.net [mailto:kq...@verizon.net]
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 03, 2010 4:34 PM
*To:* Tim Ellison
*Cc:* rjl...@gmail.com; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
*Subject:* Re: RE: Re: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
OK, so the Radio
get no answers
73,
Peter, NH6VB
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:47:19 -0400
From: rjl...@gmail.com
To: telli...@itsco.com
CC: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
You're right and makes sense to me. The fewer moving parts the better I
always say.
Rick
W2JAZ
There has been some testing with SatPC32 and RadioTuner by W6IHG with the V/U
module. Both look like they will work fine.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Richard Lawn
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010
: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
Tim, do you mean SatPC32 AND/OR Radio Tuner?
Since SatPC32 does Doppler correction and rotor pointing, I'd rather just use
it than have another application to worry about.
73, Jim KQ6EA
Aug 3, 2010 11:28:51 AM, telli...@itsco.commailto:telli...@itsco.com wrote:
There has
Really? I just use bias Ts. It works just fine with my mast mounted SSB
preamps.
-Tim
From: Peter Scheller [mailto:nh...@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:29 PM
To: Tim Ellison
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
The problem I see with the Flex as a satellite user is,
that you
...@verizon.net [mailto:kq...@verizon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 4:36 PM
To: Tim Ellison
Cc: nh...@msn.com; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: Re: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
My two cents worth is to always run separate power to my preamps.
I got tired of replacing the switching transistor
...@gmail.com; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: RE: Re: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
OK, so the Radio Tuner program completes what Nova was always lacking.
Thanks for the clarification.
Jim
Aug 3, 2010 01:31:15 PM, telli...@itsco.commailto:telli...@itsco.com wrote:
xmlns:w=urn:schemas-microsoft
From: Peter Scheller [mailto:nh...@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:29 PM
To: Tim Ellison
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
The problem I see with the Flex as a satellite user is,
that you cannot (at least yet) supply the 12VDC needed
for switching in and out antenna
) $7000.00+ radio. Would you like to
put a model T type engine hand crank on a corvette?
73,
Peter NH6VB
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:36:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
From: brian-wb6...@lloyd.com
To: nh...@msn.com
CC: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
From: Peter Scheller [mailto:nh
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Peter Scheller nh...@msn.com wrote:
Brian,
On my current satellite radio (IC-910) there is no need to run separate
power
cables to the antenna mounted pre amps. They are switched in and out by
software.
But the software has to do something to communicate
: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:07:49 -0400
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
From: brian-wb6...@lloyd.com
To: nh...@msn.com
CC: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Peter Scheller nh...@msn.com wrote:
Brian,
On my current satellite radio (IC-910) there is no need to run
, August 03, 2010 9:48 PM
To: brian-wb6...@lloyd.com
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
Well here, it is not my intention ti incite WW III.
So just for basics, Flex Radio is admit tingly a superior radio. No doubt.
Price, depends on options. With all bells
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Peter Scheller nh...@msn.com wrote:
Well here, it is not my intention ti incite WW III.
So just for basics, Flex Radio is admit tingly a superior radio. No doubt.
Price, depends on options. With all bells, accessories and whistles a price
tag
of $7000.00+ is
Peter et al,
Winmor is not intended to be a Pactor III replacement. It is designed to
have as high a data rate as possible given the legal limitations of HF
while being very robust. It is also limited by being a sound card mode.
Pactor III is a proprietary mode. The only way to legally use
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 22:19:28 -0500
From: tim.n9...@gmail.com
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Satellite Users
Peter et al,
Winmor is not intended to be a Pactor III replacement. It is designed to
have as high a data rate as possible given the legal limitations of HF
17 matches
Mail list logo
