From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:flightgear-devel-admin;flightgear.org]On Behalf Of Curtis L.
Olson
So I would say go for it, people can always maintain their local
overrides. It's not like we are changing any core functionality here.
You will never get a consensus for anything you put
David Megginson wrote:
To simplify things, I've just committed a base-package patch to bind
zoom-in to '+', zoom-out to '-', and return to default zoom to '='.
Ooh, this brings up a good point. Is there a place to store a default
David Megginson writes:
Nice work on the clickable 2D/3D panel, Andy.
A nice thing about the 3D panel is that you can zoom in on any
instrument for detail work and then zoom out again -- this will be
very valuable when we have more complicated GPS and flight director
tools with lots of
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Does it make sense to remove the 'x' and 'X' bindings and make them
available for soemthing else?
Yeah, but I don't want to get yelled at. It makes sense to change a
lot of the keybindings, if people don't mind.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL
David Megginson writes:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Does it make sense to remove the 'x' and 'X' bindings and make them
available for soemthing else?
Yeah, but I don't want to get yelled at. It makes sense to change a
lot of the keybindings, if people don't mind.
Well, the whole point
