I spent most of the time practicing holding patterns. I'm still
trying to decide whether to love or hate them: I'll write a tutorial
for sim users some day if anyone is interested. I understand that ATC
almost never uses holds any more
A lot of approach plates, needing a course reversal,
Once we get
full approach lighting implimented it's going to be hard to find
significant reasons not to do a 1.0 release ...
Instructor console, intuitive enough that non-software-engineers
can operate it without being trained by someone already familiar with it.
But that's about it.
Alex Perry writes:
Once we get
full approach lighting implimented it's going to be hard to find
significant reasons not to do a 1.0 release ...
Instructor console, intuitive enough that non-software-engineers
can operate it without being trained by someone already familiar with it.
But
Alex Perry writes:
A lot of approach plates, needing a course reversal, either use a
procedure turn or a hold. The former is easier, but needs a
depicted hold somewhere else in most cases, the latter. Thus, I've
been given radar vector, direct to navaid when able, then hold, efc
for
Alex Perry writes:
Instructor console, intuitive enough that non-software-engineers
can operate it without being trained by someone already familiar with it.
But that's about it.
Course plotting should be part of that.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alex Perry writes:
I get the impression that the US intends to transition from NDB/VOR
service to VOR/GPS service, in which case the GPS will fulfil all
the roles of the NDB in the above list, allowing NDBs to be shut
down.
I noticed that between a Canada Air Pilot (Ontario) from 2000
I had my first experience with the Elite simulator today (I missed the
version -- sorry) at a Precision Controls station. Here are some
observations. To my understanding, Elite is the most commonly-used
FTD at flight schools in Canada and the U.S., so I'll post some
initial observations, on the
Since we are comparing sims, I can relate my own experience. I got to
sit down at a C172 sim that was partially complete. Unfortunately the
primary funder of this project was killed when his 3/4 scale P-51
crashed.
Anyway, they did the bulk of their panel using 2d graphics similar to
our 2d
