[Flightgear-devel] Re: My thoughts regarding aircraft system or "hardware" simulations

2005-06-12 Thread Mostyn Gale
*** Ampere wrote: Take the electrical system, hydraulic system, and bleed air system as the examples. All these system are basically different forms of moving something from point A, through medium B, to point C. That battery on the electrical system is similar in function to the hydrauli

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: My thoughts regarding aircraft system or "hardware" simulations

2005-06-09 Thread Andy Ross
Melchior FRANZ wrote: > Sure. AFAIK, every nasal context can write into any nasal namespace. > This does include to overwrite an existing function there. I for one > am overwriting view.stepView() from my personal > $FG_ROOT/Nasal/local.nas. I've redefined controls.throttleAxis() to > grab the joy

[Flightgear-devel] Re: My thoughts regarding aircraft system or "hardware" simulations

2005-06-09 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Curtis L. Olson -- Thursday 09 June 2005 19:52: > 4b. [...] But is there a way to have a "default" nasal function that > can be overwritten by an aircraft specific function? Sure. AFAIK, every nasal context can write into any nasal namespace. This does include to overwrite an existing function