On Sun, 30 May 2004 21:58:12 +0200
Durk Talsma wrote:
I hadn't really thought about that so much. However, while these SIDs and
STARs wouldn't be very useful for AI traffic, they probably wouldn't be too
problematic either. As long as there is an initial and a final waypoint, the
expect
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 23:21, David Megginson wrote:
I agree. Unfortunately, you will find that many SIDs consist of something
along the lines of
- fly runway heading
- maintain 3,000 ft unless otherwise advised by ATC
- expect vectors on course
Similarily, many STARs simply provide an
In February Erik Hofman mentioned that Robin Peel maintains a database of
airway data, for shared use between x-plane and FlightGear. I was wondering
if there's also a database of SID and STAR procedures that we could use? The
reason I'm asking is that these might be extremely useful in
Durk Talsma wrote:
In February Erik Hofman mentioned that Robin Peel maintains a database of
airway data, for shared use between x-plane and FlightGear. I was wondering
if there's also a database of SID and STAR procedures that we could use? The
reason I'm asking is that these might be
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 19:15, David Megginson wrote:
The reason they don't work in real life is that everyone is flying at a
different speed. There's typically one STAR for every arrival direction
(often centred around a major intersection or navaid), but ATC has IFR
traffic ranging from
Durk Talsma wrote:
However, until we are at that point of sophistication, I would rather see some
standard approach and departure patterns being used than nothing at all.
I agree. Unfortunately, you will find that many SIDs consist of something
along the lines of
- fly runway heading
-
