Re: [Flightgear-devel] TACANs (was DAFIFT progress)

2003-02-03 Thread David Megginson
James Turner writes: So, armed with the knowledge that TACANs are UHF, not VHF, and that they use military channel codes, I went and looked at the DAFIF fields again ... and guess what the field two after FREQ is? Yeah, it's the channel. Boy do I feel silly. It's more complicated than

Re: [Flightgear-devel] TACANs (was DAFIFT progress)

2003-02-03 Thread Jon Stockill
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, David Megginson wrote: It's more complicated than that. DME receivers (which are UHF) can use TACANs to get distance information -- usually, you do that by tuning in a fake paired VOR frequency. For example, if I tune my DME to 108.8, or slave it to a NAV radio tuned to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] TACANs (was DAFIFT progress)

2003-02-03 Thread James Turner
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 07:40 pm, David Megginson wrote: It's more complicated than that. DME receivers (which are UHF) can use TACANs to get distance information -- usually, you do that by tuning in a fake paired VOR frequency. For example, if I tune my DME to 108.8, or slave it to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] TACANs (was DAFIFT progress)

2003-02-03 Thread David Megginson
James Turner writes: That said, the UPP TACAN is not listed in NAV.TXT, if you know of any others, please let me know and I'll check. (Or did you mean UUP, 'Uplands'?) That's it -- I was giving the ident from memory. All the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED],