Re: [Flightgear-devel] automake question

2003-11-15 Thread Erik Hofman
Andy Ross wrote: John Barrett wrote: I've got some code from another project that I'm trying to hook into FG... [which turns out to be:] I'm integrating the SpiderMonkey JS engine Into the client? Yikes. There was a big flame war the last time this was mentioned. That interpreter is almost

Re: [Flightgear-devel] automake question

2003-11-15 Thread Andy Ross
Erik Hofman wrote: BTW. Does Nasal work like PSL, int that one has to initiate each step? I've done a script manager for PSL that I've laying around somewhere that would allow multiple scripts to work simultaneously and can expand over multiple frames (instead of needing to run the whole

RE: [Flightgear-devel] automake question

2003-11-15 Thread Norman Vine
Andy Ross writes: There's no way (short of user-space context switching voodoo) to return to the top-level stack frame without trashing the frame of the recursive call. there is some neat 'C' voodoo here http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/coroutines.html Norman

RE: [Flightgear-devel] automake question

2003-11-15 Thread Norman Vine
Norman Vine wrote: Andy Ross writes: There's no way (short of user-space context switching voodoo) to return to the top-level stack frame without trashing the frame of the recursive call. there is some neat 'C' voodoo here http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/coroutines.html

Re: [Flightgear-devel] automake question

2003-11-15 Thread Erik Hofman
Andy Ross wrote: Erik Hofman wrote: BTW. Does Nasal work like PSL, int that one has to initiate each step? I've done a script manager for PSL that I've laying around somewhere that would allow multiple scripts to work simultaneously and can expand over multiple frames (instead of needing to run

Re: [Flightgear-devel] automake question

2003-11-15 Thread Erik Hofman
John Barrett wrote: Did your script manager run the framents in the same context so they shared data ?? No, the only shared data would be the property tree. Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Flightgear-devel] automake question

2003-11-14 Thread John Barrett
I've got some code from another project that I'm trying to hook into FG... it uses a short compiled program to generate a header file used by the rest of the package... I've added the program to Makefile.am, and it builds, now, how do I get that program to execute before the library that depends

Re: [Flightgear-devel] automake question

2003-11-14 Thread Curtis L. Olson
John Barrett writes: I've got some code from another project that I'm trying to hook into FG... it uses a short compiled program to generate a header file used by the rest of the package... I've added the program to Makefile.am, and it builds, now, how do I get that program to execute before

Re: [Flightgear-devel] automake question

2003-11-14 Thread John Barrett
- Original Message - From: Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 5:07 PM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] automake question John Barrett writes: I've got some code from another project that I'm trying

Re: [Flightgear-devel] automake question

2003-11-14 Thread Andy Ross
John Barrett wrote: I've got some code from another project that I'm trying to hook into FG... [which turns out to be:] I'm integrating the SpiderMonkey JS engine Into the client? Yikes. There was a big flame war the last time this was mentioned. That interpreter is almost bigger than