Michael Basler wrote:
I tried this. It was still recognizable after conversion in the HTML. I
simply searched for my address (Ctrl-GF in IE) and it was found :-( I tried
several font changes etc. which all did not hide the address.
A clever sign for/aft the @ being invisible but masking
Christian,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christian
Mayer
This gives ma an idea:
Render only the @ to a picture and include this picture instead of the
real @ sign in the address. I think this should fool enough
address-harvesters.
Sounds like a cool idea
Norman,
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Norman Vine
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why not just use ' at ' instead of '@'
note spaces surrounding 'at'
Something similar already occured to me but I've dismissed it as being
to ugly. If those named
Norman Vine wrote:
Michael Basler writes:
Christian Mayer wrote:
This gives ma an idea:
Render only the @ to a picture and include this picture instead of the
real @ sign in the address. I think this should fool enough
address-harvesters.
Sounds like a cool idea as
Chrisitan,
Well, I think even addresses like
something @ something.com
aren't save against spammers.
I guessed it.
So far the best recepie is to convert the address to little pixel
graphics and to include the images on the page.
...which 100 or so graphics you are going to create...?
Christian,
Including images in LaTeX is no problem - that just leaves us with the
problem how we are generating the images...
Exactly. Although the HTML converter might become a bit slow with 100+ pix.
Perhaps no serious problem.
I'm sure that one of the Unix gurus knows a fast way to do
Michael Basler writes:
Chrisitan,
Well, I think even addresses like
something @ something.com
aren't save against spammers.
I guessed it.
So far the best recepie is to convert the address to little pixel
graphics and to include the images on the page.
...which 100 or so
Curt,
Could you fake something as an equation:
$ curt\@flightgear.org $
latex2html would convert this to a graphic automatically ... although
in equation mode you have to worry about things getting interpreted as
equations and variables ...
Yes, latex2html does, but tex4ht which I use
