Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy?, was

2005-10-17 Thread Erik Hofman
John Wojnaroski wrote: you might try http://sourceforge.net/projects/openatc It died a quiet death when no one showed up for the network field test Hmm, it looks like it started when the time wasn't right. I think we have enough momentum right now for a restart. Erik

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy?, was README.multiplayer update

2005-10-17 Thread Oliver Schroeder
Am Saturday 15 October 2005 23:45 schrieb Arnt Karlsen: ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy, are we? No, at least I surely won't. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy?, was README.multiplayer update

2005-10-16 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
network connection to a flight simulation network, such as VATSIM or IVAO, which is based on the fsd (Flight Simulator Daemon) protocol. This is particulary useful for players who wish to have multiple network clients active at the same time. In tech-terms, PCProxy is a multi-connect

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy?, was

2005-10-16 Thread Martin Spott
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: I wonder if the flightgear server though should support the fsd protocol at some future point of time to be a gateway between our and VATSIM/IVAO flying... It's not a matter if it _should_ or not. The relevant details of the protocol, at least as used by VASTIM,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy?, was

2005-10-16 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
I wonder if the flightgear server though should support the fsd protocol at some future point of time to be a gateway between our and VATSIM/IVAO flying... It's not a matter if it _should_ or not. The relevant details of the protocol, at least as used by VASTIM, are 'closed', Security by

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy?, was

2005-10-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:11:51 +0200 (IST), Vassilii wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I wonder if the flightgear server though should support the fsd protocol at some future point of time to be a gateway between our and VATSIM/IVAO flying... It's not a matter if it _should_ or not.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy?, was

2005-10-16 Thread John Wojnaroski
you might try http://sourceforge.net/projects/openatc It died a quiet death when no one showed up for the network field test JW Vassilii Khachaturov wrote I wonder if the flightgear server though should support the fsd protocol at some future point of time to be a gateway between our

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy?, was

2005-10-16 Thread Martin Spott
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: I wonder if the flightgear server though should support the fsd protocol at some future point of time to be a gateway between our and VATSIM/IVAO flying... It's not a matter if it _should_ or not. The relevant details of the protocol, at least as used by

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy?, was

2005-10-16 Thread John Wojnaroski
Martin Spott wrote: Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: I wonder if the flightgear server though should support the fsd protocol at some future point of time to be a gateway between our and VATSIM/IVAO flying... It's not a matter if it _should_ or not. The relevant details of the