Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question about new view -- is this possible?

2003-02-04 Thread Jim Wilson
Ima Sudonim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > X-plane has a view where you can fly looking down over your scenery. > Like your flying over a map with an icon representing your plane. Nice > for VFR and for the navigationally-challengeed. A nice second view > window to have up when you're as cluless

[Flightgear-devel] Question about new view -- is this possible?

2003-02-04 Thread Ima Sudonim
X-plane has a view where you can fly looking down over your scenery. Like your flying over a map with an icon representing your plane. Nice for VFR and for the navigationally-challengeed. A nice second view window to have up when you're as cluless as I seem to be sometimes. Can this be done w

[Flightgear-devel] VFR add-on for flightgear

2003-02-04 Thread Ima Sudonim
This isn't SP*AM, I promise! It's related to flightgear. Well, possibly, anyway. I saw a while back saw an ad for a vfr flying app called ez-landmark. It has a database listing significant scenery objects that can be used to identify landmarks for VFR in FS 2k2. If you fly over major landmarks,

[Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: FlightGear/src/GUI prop_picker.cxx,1.1.1.1,1.2 prop_picker.hxx,1.1.1.1,1.2

2003-02-04 Thread Jim Wilson
This is really cool! Looking through the changes I couldn't see...should this work with all properties? The orientation and position path data doesn't seem to update realtime. I can see lots of ways this can be used for debugging. Performance impact is minimal. Best, Jim "Curtis L. Olson" <[

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Return of the BPCVS

2003-02-04 Thread John Check
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 9:46 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote: > > It might just be a simple permission problem ... > > "You don't have permission to access /doc/cvsweb/dir.gif on this > server." > > Curt. The directory containing the images isn't aliased for that virtual domain in httpd.conf. _

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Return of the BPCVS

2003-02-04 Thread John Check
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 8:38 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > John Check wrote: > > > > Okay, now I know what he meant. Maybe I'll just pull the plug. > > If you mean you might shut down the CVSWeb interface, well, don't do so > just because of this little problem. It's a very nice interface to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Unable to access base package via CVS

2003-02-04 Thread John Check
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 1:54 pm, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, James Turner wrote: > > Since the base cvs was brought back up, I haven't been able to update > > it: > > > > I get: > > cvs server: Updating . > > cvs [server aborted]: cannot stat /tmpcvslck: No such file or directo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Unable to access base package via CVS

2003-02-04 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, James Turner wrote: > Since the base cvs was brought back up, I haven't been able to update > it: > > I get: > cvs server: Updating . > cvs [server aborted]: cannot stat /tmpcvslck: No such file or directory > cvs [server aborted]: cannot stat /tmpcvslck: No such file or direct

[Flightgear-devel] Unable to access base package via CVS

2003-02-04 Thread James Turner
Since the base cvs was brought back up, I haven't been able to update it: I get: cvs server: Updating . cvs [server aborted]: cannot stat /tmpcvslck: No such file or directory cvs [server aborted]: cannot stat /tmpcvslck: No such file or directory This happened on both OS-X and Linux, so I blew

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Return of the BPCVS

2003-02-04 Thread Curtis L. Olson
John Check writes: > On Monday 03 February 2003 5:54 pm, Julian Foad wrote: > > Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 19:39:28 -0500, > > > John Check <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>Base package cvs is back, now with more cvsweb > > >> > > >>http

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Return of the BPCVS

2003-02-04 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:38:57 + (GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > We should have said "thank you for setting it up" before starting to > point out bugs :-) > > Thank you for setting it up. ..amen! ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt...

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Night approach

2003-02-04 Thread Roman Grigoriev
So nice but without light lobes is not really cool Now I work on it but all techniques that simulate per-pixel lighting requre vertex programs but plib in nearest future will not support it. Also I propose use vertex array range to render terrain What's your thoughts guys? Thanx in advance Roman -

[Flightgear-devel] Night approach

2003-02-04 Thread David Megginson
Here's a nice shot of the 310 on a long, straight-in night approach to runway 06L at CYUL (Montreal/Dorval): http://www.megginson.com/flightsim/cyul-06l.jpg All the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ ___

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] switching views (trivial)

2003-02-04 Thread Geoff Reidy
Hi Jim, Sounds good, as long as we can still switch views by the keyboard. Mouse/joystick/keyboard can be a bit hard to juggle :) Regards, Geoff Jim Wilson wrote: Hi Geoff, I've got several changes and fixes to the viewer code, one of which changes the view manager to allow what you are descr