On Sunday 20 July 2003 15:16, Major A wrote:
>
> > Ta for the info. I found that the auto-throttle holds the set speed very
> > well, even between different a/c types and it was very easy to match
speeds
> > between them. Using multiplay, with a B-52 and a YF-23 both set to the
same
> > ap
> Ta for the info. I found that the auto-throttle holds the set speed very
> well, even between different a/c types and it was very easy to match speeds
> between them. Using multiplay, with a B-52 and a YF-23 both set to the same
> ap speed, there was hardly any drift between them and it got
On Sunday 20 July 2003 02:23, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I saw you'd reverted the target climb rate calcs in cvs and now that the
old
> > alt hold is back I can see that the auto throttle response seems
considerably
> > improved.
> >
>
> You may want to p
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I saw you'd reverted the target climb rate calcs in cvs and now that the old
> alt hold is back I can see that the auto throttle response seems considerably
> improved.
>
You may want to play with the gain factor and integral for throttle to. If
you fin
On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:33, Lee Elliott wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:00, Jim Wilson wrote:
> > Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > >
> > > Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
> >
> > After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now.
On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:00, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >
> > Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
>
> After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now. Go ahead
and
> use the patch I posted last night. What I was s
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now. Go ahead and
use the patch I posted last night. What I was shooting for was a little more
smoothness when switching from V/S
On Saturday 19 July 2003 05:21, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > With the YF-23 it's
> > very obvious.
>
> Hi Lee,
>
> In a separate message I've sent a patch to backout the target climb rate
fix.
> I was able to stabalize the A/P by making adjustments with the f
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> With the YF-23 it's
> very obvious.
Hi Lee,
In a separate message I've sent a patch to backout the target climb rate fix.
I was able to stabalize the A/P by making adjustments with the fix, but the
target climb rate couldn't be over 5000fpm (the YF23 is s
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello Jim,
>
> Sorry, I missed this post at first. The porpoising is certainly related to
> the elev_adj_factor - the lower it is the worse the problem. It's hardly
> apparent with the c-172 or 747 but more so with the a4.
Try increasing then. Gene
On Friday 18 July 2003 13:30, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > The autopilot altitude hold seems a bit messed up though since yesterday -
> > quite bad porpoising - I checked that with the 747, a4, c-172 and a couple
of
> > mine. Terrain following still seems o
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> The autopilot altitude hold seems a bit messed up though since yesterday -
> quite bad porpoising - I checked that with the 747, a4, c-172 and a couple of
> mine. Terrain following still seems ok though. I doubt this is due to the
> replay stuff.
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
