> Hmm, I thought I already had, but it seems I'm mistaken. It's in the
> LaRCsim code (IO360.cxx), but never made it over to JSBSim's FGPiston.cpp.
> I believe I was gunning for about 25 rpm drop on one vs. two magnetos in
> the original code. I'll port it over...
>
Dave:
There are two active b
On 12/20/04 at 11:41 PM David Luff wrote:
>Of course, oversights like this would get picked up more easily if an
adept
>3D modeller added a magneto switch to the 3d C172
Oops, found it, bottom left!
and pa28-161 :-)
It is missing from that though.
Cheers - Dave
This message has been sc
On 12/18/04 at 7:15 PM Dave Martin wrote:
>While you're there, is there any chance of a magneto-related performance
>loss?
>
>ie: when you run left mags only you get a power loss.
>
>Cheers :)
>
Hmm, I thought I already had, but it seems I'm mistaken. It's in the
LaRCsim code (IO360.cxx), but
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 20:20:37 +, Dave Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simulated carb icing might be exciting too (coupled to weather, of
> course :-) )
>
> It would certainly make you remember to pull the lever ;)
Some day, we might model then entire air induction system, the way
that we
Simulated carb icing might be exciting too (coupled to weather, of
course :-) )
It would certainly make you remember to pull the lever ;)
On Saturday 18 Dec 2004 19:39, David Megginson wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:15:46 +, Dave Martin
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While you're there,
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:15:46 +, Dave Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While you're there, is there any chance of a magneto-related performance loss?
>
> ie: when you run left mags only you get a power loss.
It would be nice to see that generalized a bit, so that we can
eventually model fo
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:37:35 +, David Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah! Carb heating has just moved several places up my TODO list!
I'm not sure that the engine model should even be dealing with carb
heating -- it would be just as easy for something else to tell the
engine the temperatur
While you're there, is there any chance of a magneto-related performance loss?
ie: when you run left mags only you get a power loss.
Cheers :)
On Saturday 18 Dec 2004 17:37, David Luff wrote:
> David Megginson writes:
> > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:27:09 +, David Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
David Megginson writes:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:27:09 +, David Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've always assumed that it's a fairly late model injected 172, in order to
> > justify the current lack of carb heating in the engine model ;-)
>
> The 172P is carbureted, unfortunately.
>
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:27:09 +, David Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've always assumed that it's a fairly late model injected 172, in order to
> justify the current lack of carb heating in the engine model ;-)
The 172P is carbureted, unfortunately.
All the best,
David
--
http://ww
Dave Martin writes:
> On Friday 17 Dec 2004 22:27, David Megginson wrote:
>
> > Totally up to you, but my 172P POH is for the 1981 model
>
> However, I also discovered that the early 172s had more dihedral and a
> slightly different shape to the aerofoil. Comparing this the FG 172P, which
> ha
On Friday 17 Dec 2004 22:27, David Megginson wrote:
> Totally up to you, but my 172P POH is for the 1981 model
As it happens I did a bit more research and discovered that the in-wing
(landing+taxi) lights were a factory option to the end of the P's production
run. So no clues there ;)
However,
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:38:33 +, Dave Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering if the C172P is supposed to represent a specific model year?
Totally up to you, but my 172P POH is for the 1981 model, for what
that's worth. I cannot even remember the light positions on the
planes I tra
Dave Martin wrote:
Just wondering if the C172P is supposed to represent a specific model year?
I've come to the point of placing a landing light on the aircraft but the
location is different between early 172s; in the wing with a taxi light and
late 172Ps (early 80's) where it is located in the n
Just wondering if the C172P is supposed to represent a specific model year?
I've come to the point of placing a landing light on the aircraft but the
location is different between early 172s; in the wing with a taxi light and
late 172Ps (early 80's) where it is located in the nose with no taxi l
15 matches
Mail list logo
