Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)

2005-10-05 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: I have been wondering this for quite a while: will it be a good idea to provide weekly CVS snapshots? Do you mean replace the instant cvs snapshots with snapshots only taken at weekly intervals? :-)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)

2005-10-05 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On October 5, 2005 07:58 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Do you mean replace the instant cvs snapshots with snapshots only taken at weekly intervals? :-) By cvs snapshots, I mean binary-snapshots packed into .deb, .rpm, etc. Ampere ___ Flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)

2005-10-05 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: On October 5, 2005 07:58 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Do you mean replace the instant cvs snapshots with snapshots only taken at weekly intervals? :-) By cvs snapshots, I mean binary-snapshots packed into .deb, .rpm, etc. If someone wants to do this, and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)

2005-10-05 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On October 5, 2005 01:49 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote: If someone wants to do this, and promises to keep up on it, I can put a link on the FG web site ... Curt. How should the version number progress? Should it be 0.9.9, 0.9.10, 0.9.11, etc. or 0.9.9.1, 0.9.9.2, 0.9.9.3, etc? Ampere

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)

2005-10-05 Thread Andy Ross
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: Curtis L. Olson wrote: Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: By cvs snapshots, I mean binary-snapshots packed into .deb, .rpm, etc. If someone wants to do this, and promises to keep up on it, I can put a link on the FG web site ... How should the version number

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)

2005-10-05 Thread David Luff
Ampere K. Hardraade writes: On October 5, 2005 01:49 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote: If someone wants to do this, and promises to keep up on it, I can put a link on the FG web site ... Curt. How should the version number progress? Should it be 0.9.9, 0.9.10, 0.9.11, etc. or 0.9.9.1,

[Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)

2005-10-04 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
I have been wondering this for quite a while: will it be a good idea to provide weekly CVS snapshots? Ampere ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel