On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:05:31 -, Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a pretty much fixed version of the float plane model:
> http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/dhc2f.ac.gz
That works on my computer -- I can see the panel instruments for the
first time. The one currently in CVS does not
"Jim Wilson" wrote:
> BTW did you notice that you're smooth shading appears to be turned off?
I assume I never turned it on - I fear dropping framerates ;-)
Did you notice this on the IRIX screenshot (DHC2_01.jpg) or FreeBSD
(DHC2_02.jpg, DHC2_03.jpg) ? To me - despite the already discussed
Martin Spott said:
> "Jim Wilson" wrote:
> > Here's a pretty much fixed version of the float plane model:
> > http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/dhc2f.ac.gz
>
> This appears to be almost identical to the model in current CVS. The
> pilot's viewpoint appears to be a bit closer. Before:
>
> http://d
Jim Wilson wrote:
> The basic problem with the ac file is that model's data sets were being
> defined with both vertices and kids. Unfortunately I don't think the ac3d
> file spec itself explicitly says that a given obj data set must be a "Group"
> _or_ an "Object" but not both. But that is the
"Jim Wilson" wrote:
> Here's a pretty much fixed version of the float plane model:
> http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/dhc2f.ac.gz
This appears to be almost identical to the model in current CVS. The
pilot's viewpoint appears to be a bit closer. Before:
http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/F
Here's a pretty much fixed version of the float plane model:
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/dhc2f.ac.gz
The basic problem with the ac file is that model's data sets were being
defined with both vertices and kids. Unfortunately I don't think the ac3d
file spec itself explicitly says that a given o
