On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:35:37 -0600, Curtis wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> If people aren't satisfied with the ultimate resolution, then you are
> by all means free to create an alternative mac package to which I
> will freely link from the downloads page.
..I get the impression this i
--- Andrew Midosn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice that no-one is assuming that this could
> have
> been an innocent mistake. I accept that it is
> unlikely, but it wouldn't be the first time that a
> file has been included in a software release in
> error.
> I would agree that it is entire
--- Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Christian Brunschen -- Thursday 20 January 2005
> 17:43:
> > Is it really a good idea to have essentially
> religious propaganda
> > shipped in the semi-official build of FlightGear
> for Mac OS X?
>
> No! I'm utterly disgusted by this abuse! It
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
No, it doesn't. But as long as there are no links to this package from
the official FlightGear page, there isn't much we can do against this
abuse. *If* FlightGear officially links to this package, then I will
stop contributing to it.
Hmm, you might want to take a nights sleep
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:38:32 +0100, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Arthur Wiebe -- Thursday 20 January 2005 20:24:
> > What I will do and am in the process of doing is update the package to
> > include this in an About.rtf file:
> >
> > "The following contents have been included by A
* Arthur Wiebe -- Thursday 20 January 2005 20:24:
> What I will do and am in the process of doing is update the package to
> include this in an About.rtf file:
>
> "The following contents have been included by Arthur Wiebe and may not
> reflect the views of any of the contributors or developers of
Jim Wilson wrote:
David Megginson said:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:35:53 +0100, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. The responsible person should be asked to *immediately* remove the
offending religious content.
2. If he refuses (which the GPL lets him), he should not be given any
David Megginson said:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:35:53 +0100, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1. The responsible person should be asked to *immediately* remove the
> >offending religious content.
> >
> > 2. If he refuses (which the GPL lets him), he should not be given any
> >
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:35:53 +0100, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. The responsible person should be asked to *immediately* remove the
>offending religious content.
>
> 2. If he refuses (which the GPL lets him), he should not be given any
>further support. He should be bann
On Thursday 20 Jan 2005 17:35, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Christian Brunschen -- Thursday 20 January 2005 17:43:
> > Is it really a good idea to have essentially religious propaganda
> > shipped in the semi-official build of FlightGear for Mac OS X?
>
> No! I'm utterly disgusted by this abuse! It's
* Christian Brunschen -- Thursday 20 January 2005 17:43:
> Is it really a good idea to have essentially religious propaganda
> shipped in the semi-official build of FlightGear for Mac OS X?
No! I'm utterly disgusted by this abuse! It's an offense to all Jews,
Muslim, Hindu, etc. and it has *nothi
11 matches
Mail list logo
