Le lundi 20 juin 2005 à 23:39 -0400, Ampere K. Hardraade a écrit :
On June 20, 2005 09:58 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
fgfs developers aren't only pedantic, but also lazy. :-)
Errr ... busy. :-)
Curt.
Or chaotic. =)
Ampere
Oh, not so chaotic, the
* Jim Campbell -- Monday 20 June 2005 11:59:
If the actual aircraft panel is a variable control should the
representation be variable and up to the pilot to use in the
recommended fashion. Anyone any opinions on this point (maybe
I am just being too pendantic!!)?
Being pedantic is one of the
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
fgfs developers aren't only pedantic, but also lazy. :-)
Errr ... busy. :-)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt
HumanFIRST Program http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text:
On June 20, 2005 09:58 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
fgfs developers aren't only pedantic, but also lazy. :-)
Errr ... busy. :-)
Curt.
Or chaotic. =)
Ampere
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
