The http mirrors of FG are all straight mirrors of the master site, as are
the ftp mirrors. Hence the graphical scenery download page on the http
mirrors points back to the master site. Hence it's impossible to download
scenery from the ftp mirrors using the graphical interface. It seems to me
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 12:36:26PM +0100, David Luff wrote:
The http mirrors of FG are all straight mirrors of the master site, as are
the ftp mirrors. Hence the graphical scenery download page on the http
mirrors points back to the master site. Hence it's impossible to download
scenery from
James A. Treacy writes:
This is one of the reasons that relative links are a good idea. As a
made up example, a link from http://gnucash.org/en/contribute.phtml to
http://gnucash.org/pub/gnucash/sources/stable/ should use
a href=../pub/gnucash/sources/stable/ instead of
a
James A. Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is one of the reasons that relative links are a good idea. As a
made up example, a link from http://gnucash.org/en/contribute.phtml to
http://gnucash.org/pub/gnucash/sources/stable/ should use
a href=../pub/gnucash/sources/stable/ instead of
a
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Luff) [2003.10.15 06:37]:
The http mirrors of FG are all straight mirrors of the master site, as are
the ftp mirrors. Hence the graphical scenery download page on the http
mirrors points back to the master site. Hence it's impossible to download
scenery from the
Cameron Moore writes:
One way to fix this would be Javascript.
[sound of the front door slamming]
[very rapid foot steps are heard fading off into the distance ...]
I think I've been watching too many cartoons lately ... my excuse is
that my 2.5 year old daughter now lists SpongeBob
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Curt Olson) [2003.10.15 11:38]:
Cameron Moore writes:
One way to fix this would be Javascript.
[sound of the front door slamming]
[very rapid foot steps are heard fading off into the distance ...]
[ zip - Cameron zips up his flame-retardent jacket ]
I said One
Cameron Moore writes:
I said One way... And BTW, I agree. I only use JS when I have no
other choice. To me the only other choice is having a separate
graphical page for each ftp mirror, which I don't particularly like
either.
So why not JS? One can assume that anyone using the GRAPHICAL
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Curt Olson) [2003.10.15 14:05]:
Cameron Moore writes:
I said One way... And BTW, I agree. I only use JS when I have no
other choice. To me the only other choice is having a separate
graphical page for each ftp mirror, which I don't particularly like
either.
So
Cameron Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why not JS? One can assume that anyone using the GRAPHICAL interface
will have a GRAPHICAL browser, so bye-bye lynx/links. One can also
assume that only hardcore/anal users will have JS disabled, [...]
I'm not shure if I apply for these attributes
Cameron Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My suggestion for using JS was because of the whole mirroring thing. We
could do something server-side, but then our mirrors will have to be
able to handle it. I assume we are constrained to using only
client-side stuff.
In this case you're living in
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 10:49:36AM -0500, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
The difficulty for us is that our web and ftp trees are on separate
machines. They aren't even on the same server. Our ftp tree is about
13Gb, our web site is about 100Mb. If we merged all the ftp data in
with the web site,
12 matches
Mail list logo
