Hi Tim,
On Sunday 22 February 2009 12:37:55 Tim Moore wrote:
> Good to hear from you again. You should check out my recent changes to the
> groundcache code that changes it to use the OSG PolytopeIntersector. My
> thinking was that someone (perhaps you or I) could teach the polytope
> intersector
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Diogo Kastrup wrote:
>
> Ok, just replacing Gear.cpp:648 as below will do it. Now it is
> tested! ;)
Yes, this works, thanks Diogo.
Next problem: Carrier speed 20kts, start with the bo105, check ATC/AI
menu->options->turn into wind and watch the helicopter slide a
Em Ter, 2009-02-24 às 01:16 +0100, Csaba Halász escreveu:
> The groundcache fix seems to work fine, thank you.
> The fix for the stationary carrier doesn't because:
>
> (gdb) p _slipping
> $1 = true
>
> To get a stationary carrier edit $FG_ROOT/AI/nimitz_demo.xml and set
> to 0.
Ok, just replac
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Diogo Kastrup wrote:
>
> I am sending the diff again with the fix for this and the (untested) fix
> for the zero-speed problem, just in case someone want to play with it.
The groundcache fix seems to work fine, thank you.
The fix for the stationary carrier doesn'
Em Seg, 2009-02-23 às 17:58 -0300, Diogo Kastrup escreveu:
> The carrier sailing out from underneath is strange, it looks like the
> groundcache can't finding a intersection with the ground for these
> aircrafts and it is using a fallback value. Can someone check if this
> happens without my patch
Hi Melchior,
you can find the patch with, I hope, the correct improvement you asked.
I wanted to add that I really agree your point of view: "To make
listeners work as expected the solution is to make *listeners*
work as expected, not to change dialog-apply in a way that makes them
not work as
Csaba, thank you very much for testing. See my comments below.
Em Seg, 2009-02-23 às 04:59 +0100, Csaba Halász escreveu:
> I tested with the bo105 on solid ground first. It doesn't move an inch
> with engines shut down. During startup, it doesn't turn either. The
> s76c (which has wheels instead o
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Erik Hofman wrote:
>
> The main reason for implementing the property system is that it can
> represent the contents of any XML file in memory quite easily.
>
I appreciate everyone's response to my questions about describing
FlightGear's property system. I've pul
Hi,
Heiko Schulz schrieb am 23.02.2009 14:22:
>
>
>> The bo105 doesn't use Nasal for blade bending.
>>
>
>
> noticed, so it is indeed a bug in hardcode. Maik has already a patch and is
> in test on helijah. I wait for the results, because this bug could be also
> the cause for the slid
In this case you might want to check out the UFO. It has some very fancy code
for placing objects in the scenery by clicking on the ground. The basic nasal
function doing the trick is geo.put_model() (look in your data/Nasal
directory for the file geo.nas). This just places a model into the scen
hi
thanks Torsten it looks so intersting but what I want to do is to create an
object dynamicly when FG is running via the keyboard for example. I did this
before with ESP but in FG I don't know if there's a function in the source
which allows to do this.
thanks
ITAF
>
> Subject: Re: [Flight
>The bo105 doesn't use Nasal for blade bending.
noticed, so it is indeed a bug in hardcode. Maik has already a patch and is in
test on helijah. I wait for the results, because this bug could be also the
cause for the sliding.
-
> hi
>
> I would like to know if flightgear source code has any function which can
> create/remove/control AI objects ( aircraft, cars etc...)
>
> thx
Certainly it has.
You might want to read this:
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/AI_Systems
Torsten
-
> not subscribed to the flightgear-cvslogs ML ? ;-)
No, was not, but am now!
Thanks Fred.
Geoff.
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open
hi
I would like to know if flightgear source code has any function which can
create/remove/control AI objects ( aircraft, cars etc...)
thx
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
On 22 Feb 2009, at 08:23, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Modified Files:
> positioned.cxx
> Log Message:
> Compile with VS2005 in debug mode
Thanks to everyone who's had problems with this for their patience,
and to the people who worked out and committed a fix. It's my code,
but I have no
* Melchior FRANZ -- 2/23/2009 10:18 AM:
> the node value shall not be read twice
Disregard! You aren't doing that, and why should you?!
But also don't read the widget value twice, please. :-)
m.
--
Open Source Business
* Csaba Halász -- 2/23/2009 4:59 AM:
> I tested with the bo105 on solid ground first. It doesn't move an inch
> with engines shut down. During startup, it doesn't turn either.
For testing the bo105 please comment out the line starting with
antislide.setDoubleValue(...
in $FG_ROOT/Aircraft/bo1
* Heiko Schulz -- 2/22/2009 1:41 PM:
> Bo105 and S64E Skycrane using Nasal for the blade bending,
> the ec135 not!
> So it could be that it has to do with the nasal code instead
> then rather a bug in the code!
The bo105 doesn't use Nasal for blade bending.
m.
---
* Sébastien MARQUE -- 2/20/2009 1:23 AM:
> This is not new, it was the case with the precedent gui dialog, and I
> used a Nasal workaround but not really useful as it disallows to come
> back to a previous state.
I've written a lot of dialogs, the most complicated ones among them,
and I don't re
20 matches
Mail list logo
