Re: [Flightgear-devel] Building FlightGear under Vista

2010-06-26 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Hi Jon, - Jon S. Berndt a écrit : Where will I find the best, most up-to-date guide on downloading the development version of FlightGear from CVS and building it? Can I used MSVC++ Express 2008? 2010? Thanks. I haven't done this in a long, long, time. Jon On the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Issues with compiling on Gentoo 64

2010-06-26 Thread Martin Spott
Jason Cox wrote: 1. is simgear-cs flightgear-cs still required or cn I just use th gitorious versions? simgear-cs is just a customized version of SimGear for terragear-cs to run headless if you don't have a $DISPLAY available. It's not required for general operation of FlightGear. Cheers,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT

2010-06-26 Thread Erik Hofman
Good news, switching to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS solved all git problems for me. No idea why Xandros 4.5 gave me problems but Xandros seemed to have abandoned the desktop market anyhow. For what it's worth, I'm very pleased with Ubuntu so far. Erik

[Flightgear-devel] problem with git v2.0.0 -- unable to run flightgear

2010-06-26 Thread Jason Cox
Hi all, finally got it all compiled but now I get lots (about 14600) of the following that ends in a segfault Error building technique: findAttr: could not find attribute bool Error building technique: findAttr: could not find attribute bool Error building technique: findAttr: could not find

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Torsten Dreyer
The files config.h-msvc8 and config.h-msvc90 are necessary for a windows build but are now in .gitignore making them inaccessible. Natively windows has no method to generate these files from the .in files, although this is probably possible by installing Perl, and GNU versions of autoconf

Re: [Flightgear-devel] problem with git v2.0.0 -- unable to run flightgear

2010-06-26 Thread Torsten Dreyer
any ideas as miss using flightgear and want to get back to using it again soon Do you have the latest data from git but not the latest sources from git? Torsten -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Issues with compiling on Gentoo 64

2010-06-26 Thread Torsten Dreyer
these were both pulled down from gitourious today with a git clone command. Be sure to clone the branch 'next' from FlightGear and SimGear. This is the branch for the latest changes. PS. is there a better way of doing things apart from git pull and getting everything ever committed being

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Frederic Bouvier
The files config.h-msvc8 and config.h-msvc90 are necessary for a windows build but are now in .gitignore making them inaccessible. Natively windows has no method to generate these files from the .in files, although this is probably possible by installing Perl, and GNU versions of

[Flightgear-devel] Git merge oops.

2010-06-26 Thread James Turner
I pushed a wrong branch by accident, which will mess up history in the repo. Not the end of the world, but Tim can fix it if people avoid committing to fg (simgear and fgdata are unaffected) until he's rolled back my mistake. There's a separate issue that the build will be broken following my

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Alan Teeder
-- From: Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.fr Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 5:57 PM To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx The files config.h-msvc8 and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Frederic Bouvier
- Alan Teeder a écrit : Is there any need for this to be done by all new cloners before compilation? It seems to be an unnecessary complication. All GIT users should be currently working with the same version (2.0.0) in both simgear and flightgear. As and when a new version comes

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Git merge oops.

2010-06-26 Thread James Turner
On 26 Jun 2010, at 17:41, James Turner wrote: I pushed a wrong branch by accident, which will mess up history in the repo. Not the end of the world, but Tim can fix it if people avoid committing to fg (simgear and fgdata are unaffected) until he's rolled back my mistake. There's a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Jari Häkkinen
On 6/26/10 7:36 PM, Alan Teeder wrote: Is there any need for this to be done by all new cloners before compilation? It seems to be an unnecessary complication. The reason for having autoconf to replace the version string is that there should only be one place where the version string is set

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Windows config.h-mscxx

2010-06-26 Thread Durk Talsma
On Saturday 26 June 2010 07:55:10 pm Frederic Bouvier wrote: I forgot to mention I proposed this change in the CVS era before I had commit privilege. It's obvious that now I could commit the file with the correct version number, because I doubt a Linux developer will do it spontaneously ;-).

[Flightgear-devel] failed assertion

2010-06-26 Thread Alex Romosan
if i try to set the time of day (--timeofday) to anything i get fgfs: sunsolver.cxx:60: void fgSunPositionGST(double, double*, double*): Assertion `sun' failed. Abort without the timeofday flightgear starts normally. this is with the latest git. --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand

Re: [Flightgear-devel] failed assertion

2010-06-26 Thread Torsten Dreyer
if i try to set the time of day (--timeofday) to anything i get fgfs: sunsolver.cxx:60: void fgSunPositionGST(double, double*, double*): Assertion `sun' failed. Abort without the timeofday flightgear starts normally. this is with the latest git. --alex-- Should be fixed now, thanks

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Issues with compiling on Gentoo 64

2010-06-26 Thread Jason Cox
Thanks for that. I have just been using a git clone and letting it decide on what was the working copy. I think it used v2.0.0-r4 or something. All 3 were done the same, I will change them to next. only other nice thing would be a cut down of the fgdata so that I got only minimal data and do

Re: [Flightgear-devel] failed assertion

2010-06-26 Thread James Turner
On 26 Jun 2010, at 21:00, Torsten Dreyer wrote: Should be fixed now, thanks for reporting. And thanks to Torsten for fixing! James -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the