On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 22:48 +, Martin Spott wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
There already is, fgdata/Sounds
If more than 4 aircraft use the same file I'd say put them there
instead.
Coordinating aircraft development errm, teaching pigs how to
fly !? ;-)
I have to try once in a
On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 00:49 +0100, HB-GRAL wrote:
Am 08.12.11 13:36, schrieb HB-GRAL:
Hi all
Hi again
About marking closed airports in apt.dat:
- marking the name with [X] might be closer to charts I guess and
most airports marked as closed in apt.dat comes with the x
- removing x
Am 10.12.11 10:29, schrieb Erik Hofman:
On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 00:49 +0100, HB-GRAL wrote:
Am 08.12.11 13:36, schrieb HB-GRAL:
Hi all
Hi again
About marking closed airports in apt.dat:
- marking the name with [X] might be closer to charts I guess and
most airports marked as closed in
On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 11:14 +0100, HB-GRAL wrote:
The airports marked as closed are closed at all, no service. And for
temporary closed runways you will need NOTAM I think, or not?
I don't think NOTAMS are good enough for permanently closed runways.
Erik
Am 10.12.11 07:52, schrieb Tuomas Kuosmanen:
Wouldn't it be useful to somehow flag the airport as
closed/restricted/whatever in the data, so that nav displays and gps/fms
units could show a different airfield symbol if desired for closed
airports? Does the data format support this?
There is
Following up on the sound file maintenance discussion, I have created a
Wiki page to collect information on aircraft maintenance. This is
somehow connected to our FG release change log, however it also contains
other issues: things that were detected/reported and should be
adapted/fixed for
NOTAM has usually a time of validity, so permanent/long term changes
usually end up as an AIP supplement which have a longer lifespan.
Closed runways have a big white X on both ends of the runway (I guess if it
is closed both ways? ;))
One more thought: Should completely closed airports be
Yves
-Original Message-
From: HB-GRAL [mailto:flightg...@sablonier.ch]
Sent: 10 December 2011 10:25
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat update (lowercase names etc.)
Am 10.12.11 07:52, schrieb Tuomas Kuosmanen:
Wouldn't it be useful to
Hi All,
Just following up on Thorsten's email regarding aircraft maintenance, this
might be a good opportunity to mention that in the last few weeks I've been
compiling a set of ideas with respect to the continuation of the aircraft split
plan. Note that this plan evolved from ideas that were
Sure they are marked in some charts as they might be useful in an
emergency, but essentially they are not much different from a large
parking lot or a wide road.
One came in pretty handy a few years ago when a guy ran out of gas.
Something about the glimly glider (sp?)
jj
Am 11.12.11 01:10, schrieb James J. Brennan:
Sure they are marked in some charts as they might be useful in an
emergency, but essentially they are not much different from a large
parking lot or a wide road.
One came in pretty handy a few years ago when a guy ran out of gas.
Something
I did a little tweaking to the multiplayer code to allow you to use a
startup option --ai-gliders-only to, by default, load all other
players as the default-model. I accomplish that by inserting some
garbage directory in front of the model path, that way the model loading
functions just treats it
12 matches
Mail list logo
