Yeah, look here:
http://diydrones.com/profiles/blog/list?user=0bcj6vzj8r2k0
Jon
From: Curtis Olson [mailto:curtol...@flightgear.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 7:05 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Quad-copters
Quick question: Do we have
If I'm not mistaken, there's already a quad copter flight modeled with
JSBSim.
Jon
From: Curtis Olson [mailto:curtol...@flightgear.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 7:05 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Quad-copters
Quick question: Do we have a
Quick question: Do we have any working/flying examples of quad-copters in
FlightGear? One of my friends from the U of MN is involved in a cool
quad-copter based "kickstarter.com" project:
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/qfolabs/mimixtm-tilt-to-fly-controller-and-nanoqtm-copter
It's fairly h
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:24:29 +0200 (CEST)
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Simgear library naming changed recently. -lsgmagvar -lsgtiming -lsgmisc
> -lsgio -lsgserial -lsgdebug -lsgbucket -lsgstructure -lsgmath -lsgthreads
> are gone and should be replaced by -lSimGearCore -lSimGearScene
>
> Regards,
> De: "Alasdair Campbell"
>
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:47:01 +0200 (CEST)
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> > t1.update( SGGeod::fromRad(lon, lat), 0, 0 );
> >
> > There is also SGGeod::fromDeg to avoid the multiply by
> > SGD_DEGREES_TO_RADIANS
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Fred
> >
> > - Mail origin
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:47:01 +0200 (CEST)
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> t1.update( SGGeod::fromRad(lon, lat), 0, 0 );
>
> There is also SGGeod::fromDeg to avoid the multiply by SGD_DEGREES_TO_RADIANS
>
> Regards,
> -Fred
>
> - Mail original -
> > De: "Alasdair Campbell"
> > À: "FlightGear
t1.update( SGGeod::fromRad(lon, lat), 0, 0 );
There is also SGGeod::fromDeg to avoid the multiply by SGD_DEGREES_TO_RADIANS
Regards,
-Fred
- Mail original -
> De: "Alasdair Campbell"
> À: "FlightGear devel"
> Envoyé: Dimanche 14 Octobre 2012 18:26:54
> Objet: [Flightgear-devel] Simgear
Am 05.10.2012 12:53, schrieb James Turner:
> On 5 Oct 2012, at 11:32, Alexis Bory wrote:
>
>> When you do that code reading (as I do it currently for the engines) it
>> appears that at least some crucial parts are not such a woodoo and it
>> appears that adding features to improve the FDM capabilit
8 matches
Mail list logo