Am Freitag 07 Dezember 2007 schrieb LeeE:
> ...[end user rating scheme is bad idea]...
> I propose that we identify the different areas of development i.e. 3d
> model, FDM, Cockpit, flight control systems etc. and then just state
> the level of development for each of those areas.
While this is p
On Dec 7, 2007 2:43 PM, LeeE <> wrote:
> I'm not sure that a rating scheme, where the ratings are given by end
> users, is a good idea.
I'm not sure the value of debating and discussing and designing a system
that probably no one will step forward to build. But that said, if you
allow multiple
On Friday 07 December 2007 20:25, Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2007 2:20 PM, AnMaster <> wrote:
> > Just an idea:
> >
> > A rating system for users. ("Please rate this aircraft after you
> > tried it for a
> > bit!") However we can't know how well the users know how it
> > should be. Maybe we
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Dec 8, 2007, at 5:01 AM, Syd&Sandy wrote:
>>> Quite a few of the aircraft currently use the following scale:
>>>
>>> - alpha
>>> - beta
>>> - early-production
>>> - production
>>>
> (snip)
>> I agree wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2007 2:20 PM, AnMaster <> wrote:
>
>> Just an idea:
>>
>> A rating system for users. ("Please rate this aircraft after you tried it
>> for a
>> bit!") However we can't know how well the users know how it should be.
>>
Hi there,
On Dec 8, 2007, at 5:01 AM, Syd&Sandy wrote:
>> Quite a few of the aircraft currently use the following scale:
>>
>> - alpha
>> - beta
>> - early-production
>> - production
>>
(snip)
> I agree with most of the discussion , but the above scale means
> nothing to me , it doesn't give ME
On Dec 7, 2007 2:20 PM, AnMaster <> wrote:
> Just an idea:
>
> A rating system for users. ("Please rate this aircraft after you tried it
> for a
> bit!") However we can't know how well the users know how it should be.
> Maybe we
> should ask them if they are pilots/if the flew that aircraft in rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Syd&Sandy wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:39:53 + (GMT)
> Stuart Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> --- AJ MacLeod wrote:
>>> I agree that we need a better indication of "state of completion" for the
>>> models on the downloads page, but a
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:39:53 + (GMT)
Stuart Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- AJ MacLeod wrote:
> > I agree that we need a better indication of "state of completion" for the
> > models on the downloads page, but as far as I can see it will have to be a
> > very basic overview. I'm no
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Gerard robin wrote
>
> > Sent: 07 December 2007 15:44
> > To: FlightGear developers discussions
> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft Downloading and Quality
> >
> > On ven 7 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote
Gerard robin wrote
> Sent: 07 December 2007 15:44
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft Downloading and Quality
>
>
> On ven 7 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > > Yes we must not talk about artistic competences
> &
tgear-devel] Aircraft Downloading and Quality
> Nice idea!
>
> Why not add a system like: 5 stars for a very complete
> aircraft like the Senecca II or one for the not so
> goog like the fokker 70/100?
>
> So everyone can see, where is potential to develop?!
>
> Regard
Hi,
--- gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On ven 7 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > > Yes we must not talk about artistic competences
> > > (here the "msfs" models are
> > > better :( ), only to answer the question: does
> the
> > > model simulate the real
> > > one ?which d
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > Yes we must not talk about artistic competences
> > (here the "msfs" models are
> > better :( ), only to answer the question: does the
> > model simulate the real
> > one ?which degree of simulation ?
>
> Right I think- eye candies are only one
--- AJ MacLeod wrote:
> I agree that we need a better indication of "state of completion" for the
> models on the downloads page, but as far as I can see it will have to be a
> very basic overview. I'm not a fan of simplistic "star" ratings, but if the
> stars are for degree of completion and e
>
> Yes we must not talk about artistic competences
> (here the "msfs" models are
> better :( ), only to answer the question: does the
> model simulate the real
> one ?which degree of simulation ?
>
Right I think- eye candies are only one small part of
being realistic, but if we want t
On ven 7 décembre 2007, AJ MacLeod wrote:
> On Friday 07 December 2007 14:40:34 gerard robin wrote:
> > Making the 3D model "shape" is the easiest (5% of the work, more or less
> > 24 hours of work, but very complicated shape)
> > There is a lot of stuff to do:
> > =>the cockpit must completed (ver
On Friday 07 December 2007 14:40:34 gerard robin wrote:
> Making the 3D model "shape" is the easiest (5% of the work, more or less 24
> hours of work, but very complicated shape)
> There is a lot of stuff to do:
> =>the cockpit must completed (versus the A10, Alexy has spent so many time
> to do i
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Hans Fugal wrote:
> The aircraft discussion has been interesting. One stumbling block I've
> come across when deciding which aircraft to download before is the
> quality guessing game. The web site lists the author's assessment, but
> I've found that to be less useful than i
> Nice idea!> > Why not add a system like: 5 stars for a very complete>
> aircraft like the Senecca II or one for the not so> goog like the fokker
> 70/100?> > So everyone can see, where is potential to develop?!> > Regards>
> HHS> --- Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
We could give a star
Nice idea!
Why not add a system like: 5 stars for a very complete
aircraft like the Senecca II or one for the not so
goog like the fokker 70/100?
So everyone can see, where is potential to develop?!
Regards
HHS
--- Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> The aircraft discussion has been inter
The aircraft discussion has been interesting. One stumbling block I've
come across when deciding which aircraft to download before is the
quality guessing game. The web site lists the author's assessment, but
I've found that to be less useful than it could be, because some
authors say "alpha" when
22 matches
Mail list logo
