That's where I'm stuck. I don't know how to deal with that conversion. I
already asked in ML about the conversion but got no practical answer. Do
you have one?
I don't have time to sink my teeth into this right now, but perhaps the
easiest thing would be to rig flightgear to write the
I hope you all had a nice new year start.
Ok, now back to FGFS.
I don't know if I was successful, but when discussing the upcoming
apt.datformat to include a much more flexible taxiway spec, I also
lobbied to have
an airport boundary also included. If this boundary was fixed and never
On 12/29/06, Roberto Inzerillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Typo:
But that's _my_ interest right now :-) That's because I ask for
suggestions and ideas here.
What ever approach we come up with needs to be done in a way that doesn't
invalidate all your efforts the next time we regenerate the
On 12/29/06, Roberto Inzerillo wrote:
That's the point Curt. I don't care about that now. That's not my aim in
any way. Your algorithmic approach suits well when thinking globally,
and you have to, because you provide a base to a global scenery
generation process; that has to follow strict,
Hi,
I am digging into terrain tiles creation in order to get a few
airports layout more close to reality. I wonder if there's an
alternative or if there's even space to experiment new ways in getting a
highly customized geometry (especially for airport terrain meshes).
I am not very
On Thursday 28 December 2006 13:17, Roberto Inzerillo wrote:
Hi,
I am digging into terrain tiles creation in order to get a few
airports layout more close to reality. I wonder if there's an
alternative or if there's even space to experiment new ways in getting a
highly customized geometry
On 12/28/06, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On Thursday 28 December 2006 13:17, Roberto Inzerillo wrote:
Hi,
I am digging into terrain tiles creation in order to get a few
airports layout more close to reality. I wonder if there's an
alternative or if there's even space to experiment new ways
Last year, a few others and I did experiment with converting FAA airport
diagrams (vector PDF) into 3D models then importing them into FlightGear...
if that's what you are looking for.
Ampere
No, that's not the idea. I know about that experiment, I followed the
thread and looked at the
Hi Roberto!
Roberto Inzerillo wrote:
What I need is more freedom in creating/modifying geometry. That's the
point. That's at least the first step in every possible working pipeline
I could imagine.
Maybe you are aware that there is a new version of the apt.dat file
format upcoming that
9 matches
Mail list logo
