They seek only to
discredit me in the eyes of all. I think I've proven myself many times
and I have never refused any improvements for my aircraft hangar.
Except, I confess, for JSBSim (and even if the work is good why I
refuse, even JSBSim ).
Beside the fact that it isn't quite true,
Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 00:24 +0100 schrieb BARANGER Emmanuel:
I think you misinterpreted that. I refuse nothing and besides, when I
had access to the fantastic work of the PAF Team, I added it on GIT,
albeit with some corrections and / or amended (with error may be possible ).
Oh,
Hi Tuomas,
Actually, I've read the same README and come up with four different
camera configurations. I haven't tested them though, because I'm still
missing the pre-distortion piece of the puzzle. By bouncing the image
off a curved mirror, the image will be distorted as it appears on the
Le 15/02/2012 19:38, flightgear-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
--
Message: 22
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:30:51 +0100
From: kreuzritter2000kreuzritter2...@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fair practice autorisations
4 matches
Mail list logo
