gerard robin wrote:
That made me to open that topic Only to remember, that FG version 1.0.0 is
not the past.
FG plib Version 1.00 could get profit of that lot of improvements which are
included into FG OSG for instance the new JSBSim, the key features, the
Nasal improvement, and so on...
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Well, was this really the cause that the skilled developers [...] and
a lot more disappeared?
You'll certainly excuse that I won't cite names here. Nevertheless I
can affirm that this applies at least to some members of the former
active crowd - and others in the 'corona'
* gerard robin -- Thursday 02 October 2008:
I was on going to open directories on CVS for it, and i just notice
that there is yet, an other Stampe-SV4 in it, which is not mine.
[...]
AFAIK duplicate models are not whish.
Well, I said at some time that duplicating aircraft should be avoided.
* Jon S. Berndt -- Thursday 02 October 2008:
Dave C. is still out there, but he's really busy.
Dave is a bad example, as he probably really left fgfs
development because of an incident. All others that have
recently been cited as someone who left because of an
allegedly rough climate here AFAIK
gerard robin wrote:
BTW: regarding JSBSim i am trying to implement the new FDM within the FG
stable version , it should work.
I just committed the CVS version of JSBSim to the 1.0 branch.
It looks like the latest version of nasal is already present?..
Next step is to commit YASim from the OSG
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
[...] All others that have
recently been cited as someone who left because of an
allegedly rough climate here AFAIK actually left because
^
I conclude this might be the central cause of the trouble you face (and
bring to this group):
On jeudi 02 octobre 2008, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Thursday 02 October 2008:
I was on going to open directories on CVS for it, and i just notice
that there is yet, an other Stampe-SV4 in it, which is not mine.
[...]
AFAIK duplicate models are not whish.
Well, I said at
On jeudi 02 octobre 2008, Martin Spott wrote:
Another re-send excuse to all, who get this twice.
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Well, was this really the cause that the skilled developers [...] and
a lot more disappeared?
You'll certainly excuse that I won't cite names here. Nevertheless I
On vendredi 03 octobre 2008, James Turner wrote:
On 3 Oct 2008, at 11:50, gerard robin wrote:
We (I) must be patient, and still wait a long time before to get
within FG
most of the OSG features, probably not before at least 2010 or 2011
(2 or 3
years delay).
snip
Why isn't it
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Yes, indeed- the shadows were outstanding- selfshadowing aircrafts -
we had this feature before MSFS even! No it's gone- and the new shadows
are only very small progressing...
Would you consider adding your workforce and spare time to a project
where you monitor - while
Hi,
Would you consider adding your workforce and spare time to
a project
where you monitor - while lurking on the list - that people
are getting
pissed at just for having their own opinion ?
Basically, the crowd gets what they deserve: As long as the
perpetual
[b,f]laming and false
Another re-send excuse to all, who get this twice.
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Well, was this really the cause that the skilled developers [...] and
a lot more disappeared?
You'll certainly excuse that I won't cite names here. Nevertheless I
can affirm that this applies at least to some members
12 matches
Mail list logo
