Re: [Flightgear-devel] Splitting FGdata (again, but now for real)

2011-10-16 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Hi Thorsten, thanks for your reply! > Time also depends on aircraft size / commit count. Yeah I figured that out, but I cannot believe the 744 and F-16 are that different there... > Worst and longest operation is eventually filtering the repo to get rid of > all the > aircraft. With somethi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Splitting FGdata (again, but now for real)

2011-10-16 Thread ThorstenB
Am 16.10.2011 16:14, schrieb Gijs de Rooy: > For some reason, this splitting seems to takes forever on Windows (like > 25 minutes for the 744), > while Jorg managed to split the F-f16 in 90 seconds on Linux! Jorg will > run a script (being Cedric's > script, or some homemade combination) to split a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Splitting FGdata (again, but now for real)

2011-10-16 Thread Gene Buckle
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011, Gijs de Rooy wrote: > Hi, > > I started splitting fgdata this morning. Created a project to store > FlightGear aircraft repositories, > under https://gitorious.org/flightgear-aircraft > > More details are available on the wiki: > http://wiki.flightgear.org/FlightGear_Git:_sp

[Flightgear-devel] Splitting FGdata (again, but now for real)

2011-10-16 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Hi, I started splitting fgdata this morning. Created a project to store FlightGear aircraft repositories, under https://gitorious.org/flightgear-aircraft More details are available on the wiki: http://wiki.flightgear.org/FlightGear_Git:_splitting_fgdata For some reason, this splitting s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Splitting fgdata

2011-04-20 Thread Cedric Sodhi
I appreciate your effort Roland. I hope this workarround doesn't take the momentum from the original endeavor, though. On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:17:43AM +0200, Roland Häder wrote: > Hi, > > I have updated my little website, plus the fgdata.bundle and all > checksum files and signature. > > I w

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Splitting fgdata

2011-04-20 Thread Roland Häder
Hi, I have updated my little website, plus the fgdata.bundle and all checksum files and signature. I will try to add a shell script to automatically recreate the bundle including all checksum files (signature is STRONGLY not recommended with automatism because you need give the server your privat

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Splitting fgdata

2011-04-20 Thread Csaba Halász
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..should say: wget -c \ > http://flightgear.mxchange.org/pub/fgfs/fgdata.bundle > so the download can be resumed if it stalls or somesuch, > rather than try wget the whole bundle into fgdata.bundle.1, > fgdata.bundle.2 because etc those wid

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Splitting fgdata

2011-04-20 Thread Roland Häder
Hi, will be fixed soon. Thanks. :-) Roland On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 23:05 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > ..should say: wget -c \ > http://flightgear.mxchange.org/pub/fgfs/fgdata.bundle > so the download can be resumed if it stalls or somesuch, > rather than try wget the whole bundle into fgdata.bund

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Splitting fgdata

2011-04-20 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:17:35 +0200, Roland wrote in message <1303319855.23358.110.camel@quix0r>: > Hi, > > you can download my fgdata bundle from here [1]. You can (and should) > verify it with provided hashes and signature (GPG). After that you can > extract it with gitbundle (or so). The usage

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Splitting fgdata

2011-04-20 Thread Roland Häder
Hi, you can download my fgdata bundle from here [1]. You can (and should) verify it with provided hashes and signature (GPG). After that you can extract it with gitbundle (or so). The usage of that tool should be widely documented. Anyway, I like your idea (and many others here as well) because i

[Flightgear-devel] Splitting fgdata

2011-04-20 Thread Cedric Sodhi
Dear Subscribers, I'm in the unfortunate situation that I want to build from GIT and therefore need the fgdata. But despite my rather good (20Mbs) connection it's impossible for me to obtain the whole repository from scratch. It's about 8.4 Gigabytes, I can rightfully assume one of the biggest rep