This definitely looks like a good time to check your cows. My first knee
jerk reaction if I see this would be to reinstall the nvidia drivers from
nvidia.com, and if you don't have nvidia video hardware and you are running
linux, then hopefully someone else can lend a hand since I stick to nvidia
I second that. As the matter of fact I stick to nVidea for all machines
over the years, because I feel that nVidea should be rewarded for their
support of Linux and ATI should be punished for not taking Linux seriously.
m
Op 25-07-10 15:39, Curtis Olson schreef:
This definitely looks like a
On Sunday 25 July 2010 18:38:45 fiers...@zonnet.nl wrote:
I second that. As the matter of fact I stick to nVidea for all machines
over the years, because I feel that nVidea should be rewarded for their
support of Linux and ATI should be punished for not taking Linux seriously.
On the other
Yea, that turned out to be the problem. Not sure why, but as a last resort
and late at night I reinstalled the Nvidia driver and that cleared the
problem.
Now I'm looking for a good doc or tutorial on creating AI traffic and
lots of activity at an airport. Have a couple of talks coming up to
On Sunday 25 July 2010 10:19:46 am Stefan Seifert wrote:
On Sunday 25 July 2010 18:38:45 fiers...@zonnet.nl wrote:
I second that. As the matter of fact I stick to nVidea for all machines
over the years, because I feel that nVidea should be rewarded for their
support of Linux and ATI should
Op 25-07-10 19:19, Stefan Seifert schreef:
On the other hand, I'm running a system with 100% free software thanks to
AMD's releasing of documentation for driver writers for ATI cards. And my ATI
card with its free drivers allowed me for the first time in many years not
only
to run FlightGear
Op 26-07-10 07:14, fiers...@zonnet.nl schreef:
Op 25-07-10 19:19, Stefan Seifert schreef:
On the other hand, I'm running a system with 100% free software thanks to
AMD's releasing of documentation for driver writers for ATI cards. And my ATI
card with its free drivers allowed me for the
Doing this build on a new machine, thinking I have all the required
support files and libraries loaded and new data files. Things work fine
with 1.9.1 on the other machine, but that was done almost two years ago
and the memory is fuzzy and any notes are long gone.
Just a quick try to see if
I'm asking the same question again. :-(
Started a build of the CVS on an older 32-bit machine and wound up in
the same place
clude -DPKGLIBDIR=\/usr/local/share/FlightGear\ -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT
-MT fg_os_osgviewer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/fg_os_osgviewer.Tpo -c -o
fg_os_osgviewer.o
Yes, there was some discussion a while back about adding the boost
dependency. There should be prebuilt boost packages for most linux
distributions.
Regards,
Curt.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 3:51 PM, John Wojnaroski wrote:
I'm asking the same question again. :-(
Started a build of the CVS on
Hi John,
I can't find a --without-boost option in configure.ac, either for SimGear or
FlightGear.
Simgear configure abort when a suitable boost version is not found. Required
minimum version of boost is 1.34
-Fred
- John Wojnaroski a écrit :
I'm asking the same question again. :-(
Curtis Olson wrote:
Yes, there was some discussion a while back about adding the boost
dependency. There should be prebuilt boost packages for most linux
distributions.
Regards,
Curt.
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 14:39 -0700, John Wojnaroski wrote:
Hmm, running Centos-5.3 and the
Hmm, running Centos-5.3 and the latest boost version in that distro is
1.33. Do you happen to know the latest version on RH? Debian is 1.35
based on the packages in the stable release.
I'm not all that conversant on the benefits of boost. what is gained?
Tried compiling a boost library
[r...@moat FlightGear-1.9.1]# ./configure --help
`configure' configures this package to adapt to many kinds of systems.
:
:
Optional Packages:
--with-PACKAGE[=ARG]use PACKAGE [ARG=yes]
--without-PACKAGE do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no)
--with-boost[=DIR]
:
:
:
Odd,
Curtis Olson wrote:
Yes, there was some discussion a while back about adding the boost
dependency. There should be prebuilt boost packages for most linux
distributions.
Note that just the Boost header files are required - which makes adding
Boost to the setup quite easy,
Martin -
OK, that cleared up the path problem. As for the seg fault, decided to
step back to 1.9.0 and now I'm starting to regress :-(
Running centos-5.3 (64-bit version) and the latest boost version there is
1.33, so tried a build without boost rather that trying an upgrade to 1.34
Simgear-1.9.0
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 23:22 -0700, cas...@mminternet.com wrote:
Hi,
Did an upload of the the latest CVS 1.9.1, build went just fine but when
starting the following happens...
[cas...@rampart FlightGear]$ ./run
***
***
*** Warning: changing bad FG_ROOT/--fg-root to
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 19:16 -0600, Ron Jensen wrote:
The warning message is new. The fgfs binary automatically changes
FGROOT to $FGROOT/data if it doesn't find the data folder in $FGROOT
where it belongs. However many tools break on $FGROOT/data so now the
fgfs binary issues a warning
Hi,
Did an upload of the the latest CVS 1.9.1, build went just fine but when
starting the following happens...
[cas...@rampart FlightGear]$ ./run
***
***
*** Warning: changing bad FG_ROOT/--fg-root to
'/usr/local/share/FlightGear/data'
***
***
***
***
*** Warning: changing bad
19 matches
Mail list logo
