--
From: leee l...@spatial.plus.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:05 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] auto-coordination broken
On Tuesday 22 Dec 2009, Alan
On Wednesday 23 Dec 2009, Alan Teeder wrote:
--
From: leee l...@spatial.plus.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:05 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] auto
Ron Jensen wrote:
Are you sure you don't have some noisy input
device like a joystick or pedals connected that might affect the
rudder axis?
If two input axes are bound to the same control the last write wins.
Thanks for the hint. That helps. It makes sense from
a
discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] auto-coordination broken
Ron Jensen wrote:
Are you sure you don't have some noisy input
device like a joystick or pedals connected that might affect the
rudder axis?
If two input axes are bound to the same
On 12/22/2009 02:35 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I think all that is required is that we make clear that auto-coordination is
designed to help people without any rudder control axis, and that a proper
rudder axis (or even a twist axis on a joystick) is preferable.
On 12/21/2009 08:59 PM,
On 22 Dec 2009, at 12:23, John Denker wrote:
I won't bother to ask why some people consider a discussion
of auto-coordination to be hijacking an auto-coordination
thread.
I think that comment was because you replied to the 'autopilot broken' thread
to start the auto-coordination discussion.
On Tuesday 22 Dec 2009, Alan Teeder wrote:
[snip...]
The Ercoupe and certain other aircraft (e.g. TSR2) may have an
aileron-rudder interconnect, but this is very aircraft specific
and should be part of the aircraft FCS model.
The YASim BAC-TSR2 doesn't/didn't/shouldn't have an aileron-rudder
The –enable-auto-coordination feature never worked very well,
but now it even more broken than it used to be. I observe
different symptoms in different aircraft.
In the default c172p, it appears to have no effect at all.
In the SenecaII, the most observable effect is that it makes
it
Hi,
The –enable-auto-coordination
feature never worked very well,
but now it even more broken than it used to be. I observe
different symptoms in different aircraft.
In the default c172p, it appears to have no effect at all.
If so, then it must be something happened recently. With CVS
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Did you try to turn on/off jaw damper?
Hah, I tried that on my wife and it didn't work ... :-)
(jaw being a bone in the mouth, yaw being side to side motion.)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/
Did you try to turn
on/off jaw damper?
Hah, I tried that on my wife and it didn't work
... :-)
(jaw being a bone in the mouth, yaw being side
to side motion.)
Curt.
--
Upss...Lol! :D
Maybe I used this word instead because thinking of my own jaw which still pains
a bit after
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, John Denker wrote:
In the default c172p, it appears to have no effect at all.
In the SenecaII, the most observable effect is that it makes
it impossible to steer when trying to taxi. In the air it
does not noticeably improve the coordination. Sometimes I
see an
On 12/21/2009 02:36 PM, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
It seems to work ok here.
Interesting
Are you sure you don't have some noisy input
device like a joystick or pedals connected that might affect the
rudder axis?
If two input axes are bound to the same control the last write wins.
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 17:45 -0700, John Denker wrote:
On 12/21/2009 02:36 PM, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
It seems to work ok here.
Interesting
Another thread hijacked.
Are you sure you don't have some noisy input
device like a joystick or pedals connected that might affect the
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Ron Jensen wrote:
In my view --enable-auto-coordination is a game feature, and usable for
people without a rudder axis control. A group you seem to have
completely overlooked.
Yup, it's never been intended to be more than a simple work around for
people
15 matches
Mail list logo
