> Hi Torsten
>
> I only missed the statements from your message here in the list, which
> is very important to see current progress. Because i.e. Text on
> gitorious does not reflect the new plan. Sorry, I was away for some
> weeks ... Maybe I will add a "box" or something on top of the wiki page
>
Am 01.06.11 07:41, schrieb Torsten Dreyer:
>> Can you please update http://wiki.flightgear.org/Release_Plan with this
>> very important information ? Something like a short description of
>> current state ?
>>
>> Thanks a lot, Yves
> Hi Yves,
>
> this particular wiki page was written (mostly by mys
> we need to sit on this as
> 2.2.freeflightsim.org.. We need a marketing plam somwhat.. I hope we stick
> to release schedule..
We are currently well on track. We fixed many bugs from the tracker and now
that June has arrived, there are just roughly two weeks until we freeze 'next'
for the final
> Can you please update http://wiki.flightgear.org/Release_Plan with this
> very important information ? Something like a short description of
> current state ?
>
> Thanks a lot, Yves
Hi Yves,
this particular wiki page was written (mostly by myself) to document our
release plan. I tried to make
we need to sit on this as
2.2.freeflightsim.org.. We need a marketing plam somwhat.. I hope we stick
to release schedule..
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:15 PM, HB-GRAL wrote:
> Am 22.05.11 14:37, schrieb ThorstenB:
> > Hi,
> >
> > since there were no major objections to the release plan, we're
> >
Am 22.05.11 14:37, schrieb ThorstenB:
> Hi,
>
> since there were no major objections to the release plan, we're
> proceeding as proposed.
>
> Current status:
>
> * We've "officially grounded" the releases/2.2.0 git branches yesterday.
> The flightgear/simgear "releases/2.2.0" branches were merged b
Hi,
since there were no major objections to the release plan, we're
proceeding as proposed.
Current status:
* We've "officially grounded" the releases/2.2.0 git branches yesterday.
The flightgear/simgear "releases/2.2.0" branches were merged back to
"master" (not "next"! "master" always contains
Am Donnerstag, den 19.05.2011, 17:47 +0100 schrieb Vivian Meazza:
> I think the question we have to ask is not "when" but "how". Until that is
> solved, the "when" is pretty meaningless.
And the last release got stalled more on a "who" than a "how" alone,
when several people became too busy/blocke
> It's as good a plan as any other.
There was another release plan? Wasn't aware of it ;-)
> However we missed the last planned
> release (2.2.0). I'm unaware of the reason(s), but I assume that release
> is dead.
Yes, we simply declare it dead. To much has changed since the day we branched.
> So
On Thu, 19 May 2011 17:47:43 +0100, Vivian wrote in message
<6F98880E3CB048A183E86552C9E0CA5E@MAIN>:
> Torsten wrote
>
> >
> > during this year's LinuxTag, Martin Spott, Mathias Fröhlich,
> > Thorsten Brehm
> > and myself developed a strategy and a concept about how to kick out
> > new releases
Torsten wrote
>
> during this year's LinuxTag, Martin Spott, Mathias Fröhlich, Thorsten
> Brehm
> and myself developed a strategy and a concept about how to kick out new
> releases of FlightGear on a regular schedule.
>
> Please find our first draft here: http://wiki.flightgear.org/Release_Plan
Hi everybody,
during this year's LinuxTag, Martin Spott, Mathias Fröhlich, Thorsten Brehm
and myself developed a strategy and a concept about how to kick out new
releases of FlightGear on a regular schedule.
Please find our first draft here: http://wiki.flightgear.org/Release_Plan
For the imp
12 matches
Mail list logo
