On Apr 26, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Alex Buzin wrote:
> Hi!
> On Saturday, April 26, 2008 Adam Dershowitz wrote
>>
>> Then your extension must be handling the input differently. When
>> data
>> is read in from a text file, using --generic it is not possible with
>> the current code to read in a doub
Hi!
On Saturday, April 26, 2008 Adam Dershowitz wrote
>
> Then your extension must be handling the input differently. When data
> is read in from a text file, using --generic it is not possible with
> the current code to read in a double. It is called an FG_DOUBLE in
> some places in the code, bu
On Apr 26, 2008, at 3:16 AM, Alex Buzin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Friday, April 25, 2008 Melchior FRANZ wrote
>>
>> * Adam Dershowitz -- Thursday 24 April 2008:
>>> I spent a while trying to track this down, and finally figured out
>>> what is going on. The problem is that generic.cxx can only handle
Hi!
On Friday, April 25, 2008 Melchior FRANZ wrote
>
> * Adam Dershowitz -- Thursday 24 April 2008:
>> I spent a while trying to track this down, and finally figured out
>> what is going on. The problem is that generic.cxx can only handle
>> floats, and that is not enough resolution for latitude
* Adam Dershowitz -- Thursday 24 April 2008:
> I have run into what might be different issue...and might be what you
> are talking about.
>
> With playback data the ground slightly jumps back and forth. It looks
> almost like a vibration. It seems to happen with all of the views.
Yes, soun
On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
On Apr 21, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Adam Dershowitz -- Monday 21 April 2008:
I did make the minor change that Alex suggested in this discussion:
[...]
and then rebuilt and it seems to be working. Is that essentially
the c
On Apr 21, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Adam Dershowitz -- Monday 21 April 2008:
>> I did make the minor change that Alex suggested in this discussion:
>> [...]
>> and then rebuilt and it seems to be working. Is that essentially
>> the change that you were referring to?
>
> It'
* Adam Dershowitz -- Monday 21 April 2008:
> I did make the minor change that Alex suggested in this discussion: [...]
> and then rebuilt and it seems to be working. Is that essentially
> the change that you were referring to?
It's the correct thread. The fix isn't and will probably cause oth
On Apr 19, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Curtis Olson -- Saturday 19 April 2008:
I think Melchior is the expert on this subject.
Hehe ... yes, kind of. It's probably the bug that I introduced
shortly before and fixed again shortly after the 1.0 release.
I don't think there's a w
Hi!
On Saturday 19 April 2008 Curtis Olson wrote:
>>Would it be possible to introduce a bit of smoothing on your end, so that
>>the aircraft position updates
>>are more smooth and continuous? If nothing else it would be interesting
>>to see if this fixes your
>>problem, and also to see how mu
* Curtis Olson -- Saturday 19 April 2008:
> I think Melchior is the expert on this subject.
Hehe ... yes, kind of. It's probably the bug that I introduced
shortly before and fixed again shortly after the 1.0 release.
I don't think there's a way to fix it without recompiling.
Smoothing will certain
Hi Adam,
I think Melchior is the expert on this subject. My particular problem has
been fixed ... it was an order dependency between when the data came in and
when the view parameters were computed.
By necessity, there is some smoothing in the view position for the external
chase views. This co
For what it is worth, it looks like I have found, and been asking
about, is an easy and reliable way to reproduce the bug discussed here:
http://tinyurl.com/3muc7m
Sorry I missed it before, but I did hunt around, but had it described
very differently.
As Curt mentioned, this is a MAJOR issue,
Sorry to keep adding to the emails, but I found something else
interesting. The flash doesn't seem to happen for the cockpit view,
the tower view, or the fly-by view.
Does the issue relate to how the other cameras locations are being
calculated? The other cameras all have to move when the
On Apr 17, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
> I am driving FlightGear with a text file of data. For some reason,
> when I am looking at an external view, for each altitude change there
> is an annoying flash. It looks like a single frame being drawn in the
> wrong position. I can somet
15 matches
Mail list logo
