Hi Gijs,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Gijs de Rooy wrote:
I would be glad to translate a couple of pages into Dutch for a test.
Please take a look at the Main Page for an example making use of the third
option
offered by Simon. Comments are
Hey Gijs and all,
I've contacted Peter off-list regarding the wiki style.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Wiki styles
Our wiki supports a couple of styles, including Monobook (used by Wikipedia,
and default
included in every mediawiki package) and
Hi Simon
I've been testing the latest MediaWiki code and have had troubles with
the fratman style, so Monobook may become the default if I can get a
suitable corner logo done. Either way, it's always an optional
preference to use Monobook.
Personally this is good news to me...
As far as
Gijs de Rooy wrote:
I would be glad to translate a couple of pages into Dutch for a test.
Please take a look at the Main Page for an example making use of the third
option
offered by Simon. Comments are welcome ofcourse.
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Main_Page
Regards,
Gijs
Hi Peter (and Torsten),
I am not the owner of the wiki (altough I do understand it might look so
sometimes :p).
I do have some right (eg. deleting pages), but I have no acces to the database
nor to
the wiki configurations. For that you have to contact the owner, which is Simon
Hollier.
He
Hi Pigeon,
I was saying the same thing on irc a while ago. It is a pretty cool
logo. I'm wondering if it is ok to give us the (high res) source of it?
It might be cool if we could use the same text and replacing it with
different aircraft to suit different people's tastes. Might be useful
Just thought I'd mention that the I agree that the wiki logo is really nice.
As the creator of the current logo on the flightgear web page (a lng
time ago) I'd say it's time for a change.
Jon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Olson
Sent:
Hey Curt,
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Curtis Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed the flightgear wiki has a pretty slick logo. It might be fun
to update the main flightgear web site with the same logo. I'm asking here
to see if the wiki logo author is ok with me using this logo
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:19:27 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel]
flightgear wiki logo So much as I know it was Gijs de Rooy, but I don't
know if he read this here. But you will find him the forum!No, it wasn't me
I just noticed the flightgear wiki has a pretty slick logo. It might be fun
to update the main flightgear web site with the same logo. I'm asking here
to see if the wiki logo author is ok with me using this logo for the main
flightgear page as well?
That was done by a friend of mine,
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I have no strong opinions on where we host the wiki. If there is a
general consensus here, I can add wiki.flightgear.org to point to [tell
me the IP #] and update the link on the FG documentation page.
I'm voting for making the new Wiki the 'official' one,
Martin Spott a écrit :
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I have no strong opinions on where we host the wiki. If there is a
general consensus here, I can add wiki.flightgear.org to point to [tell
me the IP #] and update the link on the FG documentation page.
I'm voting for making the new
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Martin Spott a écrit :
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I have no strong opinions on where we host the wiki. If there is a
general consensus here, I can add wiki.flightgear.org to point to [tell
me the IP #] and update the link on the FG documentation page.
Hmmm. In much of the stuff that I've written and contributed to the
Seedwiki wiki, the links embedded in the text did not survive the
port to this new wiki.
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove snip-me. to email)
As a child I understood how to
On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:57:30 -0400
simon wrote:
Good thoughts - I agree one wiki will do, I'm just trying to make the
case for a better wiki than the current one.
Judging from the lack of response, I'm guessing there aren't many
strong (any at all) opinions on the matter and this idea may
simon wrote :
Martin Spott wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts / comments ?
I don't want to discourage you, FlightGear needs every helping hand.
BUT it might be a bit counterproductive if everyone creates their own
FlightGear wiki. Before starting a new one you probably
Erik Hofman wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
simon wrote:
Does anyone know who is the maintainer of the current wiki?
I once tried to get into contact with him but didn't succeed in finding
any imprint on these pages :-(
Eh, A Wiki is by nature community based, so there is no owner...
I'm
On Friday 26 May 2006 13:57, simon wrote:
Judging from the lack of response, I'm guessing there aren't many strong
(any at all) opinions on the matter and this idea may just fall through
the cracks.
No. I like it very much. It is much better and more sane than the current
one that we are
I have no strong opinions on where we host the wiki. If there is a
general consensus here, I can add wiki.flightgear.org to point to [tell
me the IP #] and update the link on the FG documentation page.
Curt.
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 13:57, simon wrote:
Judging
Martin Spott wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts / comments ?
I don't want to discourage you, FlightGear needs every helping hand.
BUT it might be a bit counterproductive if everyone creates their own
FlightGear wiki. Before starting a new one you probably should have
contacted
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts / comments ?
I don't want to discourage you, FlightGear needs every helping hand.
BUT it might be a bit counterproductive if everyone creates their own
FlightGear wiki. Before starting a new one you probably should have
contacted the maintainer of the other
21 matches
Mail list logo
