Hi Gijs,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
>> Gijs de Rooy wrote:
>> I would be glad to translate a couple of pages into Dutch for a test.
> Please take a look at the Main Page for an example making use of the third
> option
> offered by Simon. Comments are welcome ofcourse.
>
> Gijs de Rooy wrote:
> I would be glad to translate a couple of pages into Dutch for a test.
Please take a look at the Main Page for an example making use of the third
option
offered by Simon. Comments are welcome ofcourse.
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Main_Page
Regards,
Gijs
Hi Simon
> I've been testing the latest MediaWiki code and have had troubles with
> the fratman style, so Monobook may become the default if I can get a
> suitable corner logo done. Either way, it's always an optional
> preference to use Monobook.
Personally this is good news to me...
> As far
Hey Gijs and all,
I've contacted Peter off-list regarding the wiki style.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
> Wiki styles
> Our wiki supports a couple of styles, including Monobook (used by Wikipedia,
> and default
> included in every mediawiki package) and fratman_enhanced
Hi Peter (and Torsten),
I am not the owner of the wiki (altough I do understand it might look so
sometimes :p).
I do have some right (eg. deleting pages), but I have no acces to the database
nor to
the wiki configurations. For that you have to contact the owner, which is Simon
Hollier.
He r
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> Just thought I'd mention that the I agree that the wiki logo is really nice.
> As the creator of the current logo on the flightgear web page (a lng
> time ago) I'd say it's time for a change.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Just thought I'd mention that the I agree that the wiki logo is really nice.
As the creator of the current logo on the flightgear web page (a lng
time ago) I'd say it's time for a change.
Jon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Olson
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi Pigeon,
>I was saying the same thing on irc a while ago. It is a pretty cool
> logo. I'm wondering if it is ok to give us the (high res) source of it?
> It might be cool if we could use the same text and replacing it with
> different aircraft to suit different people's tastes. Might be usef
> > I just noticed the flightgear wiki has a pretty slick logo. It might be fun
> > to update the main flightgear web site with the same logo. I'm asking here
> > to see if the wiki logo author is ok with me using this logo for the main
> > flightgear page as well?
>
> That was done by a friend
> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:19:27 +> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel]
> flightgear wiki logo>> So much as I know it was Gijs de Rooy, but I don't
> know if he read this here. But yo
Hey Curt,
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Curtis Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just noticed the flightgear wiki has a pretty slick logo. It might be fun
> to update the main flightgear web site with the same logo. I'm asking here
> to see if the wiki logo author is ok with me using this l
Hi,
So much as I know it was Gijs de Rooy, but I don't know if he read this here.
But you will find him the forum!
Indeed that's much better than the current logo, which looks pretty old.
Thanks to Gijs!
If we change the logo- can we change the design of the official page of
FlightGear too?
On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:57:30 -0400
simon wrote:
>
> Good thoughts - I agree one wiki will do, I'm just trying to make the
> case for a better wiki than the current one.
> Judging from the lack of response, I'm guessing there aren't many
> strong (any at all) opinions on the matter and this idea m
Hmmm. In much of the stuff that I've written and contributed to the
Seedwiki wiki, the links embedded in the text did not survive the
port to this new wiki.
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to g
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Martin Spott a écrit :
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
I have no strong opinions on where we host the wiki. If there is a
general consensus here, I can add wiki.flightgear.org to point to [tell
me the IP #] and update the link on the FG documentation page.
On Sun, 28 May 2006 13:26:43 +0200, Frederic wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Martin Spott a �crit :
> > "Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
> >
> >> I have no strong opinions on where we host the wiki. If there is a
> > > general consensus here, I can add wiki.flightgear.org to point to
> > > [t
Martin Spott a écrit :
> "Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
>
>> I have no strong opinions on where we host the wiki. If there is a
>> general consensus here, I can add wiki.flightgear.org to point to [tell
>> me the IP #] and update the link on the FG documentation page.
>>
>
> I'm voting for mak
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
> I have no strong opinions on where we host the wiki. If there is a
> general consensus here, I can add wiki.flightgear.org to point to [tell
> me the IP #] and update the link on the FG documentation page.
I'm voting for making the new Wiki the 'official' one,
I have no strong opinions on where we host the wiki. If there is a
general consensus here, I can add wiki.flightgear.org to point to [tell
me the IP #] and update the link on the FG documentation page.
Curt.
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 13:57, simon wrote:
Judging f
On Friday 26 May 2006 13:57, simon wrote:
> Judging from the lack of response, I'm guessing there aren't many strong
> (any at all) opinions on the matter and this idea may just fall through
> the cracks.
No. I like it very much. It is much better and more sane than the current
one that we are u
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > Seedwiki has a near wysiwyg way to edit pages, but the display is
> > restrained in a narrow strip. I find mediawiki ( or at least your
> > implementation ) easier to read and certainly to design pages because it
> > offers the whole screen to edit.
I agree that this
Hi Simon,
very professional work, really an invitation to look around!
I hope that your improvement of the wiki will be accepted.
All the best
Georg "HeliFlyer" EDDW
---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fu
Hi Fred,
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
>
> Seedwiki is an offered service and the FlightGear page was first setup
> by David M. as an easy way to gather additional documentation without
> the need of a maintainer.
>
> Seedwiki has a near wysiwyg way to edit pages, but the display is
> restrained in a
Erik Hofman wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
>> simon wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone know who is the maintainer of the current wiki?
>>
>> I once tried to get into contact with him but didn't succeed in finding
>> any imprint on these pages :-(
>
> Eh, A Wiki is by nature community based, so there is n
simon wrote :
> Martin Spott wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Thoughts / comments ?
>>>
>>
>> I don't want to discourage you, FlightGear needs every helping hand.
>> BUT it might be a bit counterproductive if everyone creates their own
>> FlightGear wiki. Before starting a new on
Martin Spott wrote:
simon wrote:
Does anyone know who is the maintainer of the current wiki?
I once tried to get into contact with him but didn't succeed in finding
any imprint on these pages :-(
Eh, A Wiki is by nature community based, so there is no owner...
I added a few entries, which
simon wrote:
> Does anyone know who is the maintainer of the current wiki?
I once tried to get into contact with him but didn't succeed in finding
any imprint on these pages :-(
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
-
Martin Spott wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts / comments ?
I don't want to discourage you, FlightGear needs every helping hand.
BUT it might be a bit counterproductive if everyone creates their own
FlightGear wiki. Before starting a new one you probably should have
contacted t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thoughts / comments ?
I don't want to discourage you, FlightGear needs every helping hand.
BUT it might be a bit counterproductive if everyone creates their own
FlightGear wiki. Before starting a new one you probably should have
contacted the maintainer of the other wik
29 matches
Mail list logo
