On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Csaba Halász wrote:
>
> Sounds like as if you really have a problem with your fgdata checkout.
And I have a problem with replying to old mail :)
Never mind the noise.
--
Csaba/Jester
--
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:15 AM, wrote:
>
> > Lightning works fine here.
>
> Here it does not. Pulled flightgear, simgear and fgdata today, compiled
> simgear and flightgear.
>
> *Lightning*
>
> FGTable: row lookup is not monotonically increasing
> in row 13 of table in AugThrust:
> 2
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 13:33 +0200, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> >> fgdata, but while git status lists a couple of files as having
> >> differences, that are files I know should be different because I changed
> >> them. No aircraft is listed as being different.
> >
Hi Thorsten,
For me 'git pull
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> git will not merge anything into your local branch when it
> contains uncommitted changes. git pull ought to have complained about
> that. (And it sure does here.)
Or not. sigh. It was too long since I used git pull. It does indeed merge
despite loc
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> I did (naively perhaps) change some files inside fgdata, and indeed
>
> git status
>
> gave a list of precisely those files as out of sync - which didn't really
> worry me. But evidence suggests that in fact a lot more was not updated
> for what
>> fgdata, but while git status lists a couple of files as having
>> differences, that are files I know should be different because I changed
>> them. No aircraft is listed as being different.
>
> The inter-dependencies in the Base Package between seemlingly unrelated
> pieces have grown _that_ muc
"Alan Teeder" wrote:
> It is a sad fact that git pull does not bring everything up to date in the
> same way that cvs and svn do.
"git checkout -f" !?
>From my perspective that one's a lot better that CVS for example, which
had been dropping changes silently
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Un
thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> fgdata, but while git status lists a couple of files as having
> differences, that are files I know should be different because I changed
> them. No aircraft is listed as being different.
The inter-dependencies in the Base Package between seemlingly unrelated
piece
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 11:15 +0200, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> > Lightning works fine here.
>
> Here it does not. Pulled flightgear, simgear and fgdata today, compiled
> simgear and flightgear.
>
> Error logs attached.
Could it be you're running on Windows?
Thinks like case insensitive filen
--
From:
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 9:15 AM
To: "FlightGear developers discussions"
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Nonfunctional airplanes
>
> > Lightning works fine here.
>
> Here it does not. Pulled flightgear,
> Lightning works fine here.
Here it does not. Pulled flightgear, simgear and fgdata today, compiled
simgear and flightgear.
Error logs attached.
I was entertaining the theory that something is wrong in the way I update
fgdata, but while git status lists a couple of files as having
differences
Will look later this day
On 11/24/2010 03:32 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> >But the
>
> >737-300 fails C172P and others work.
>
>
> I guess still the problem is is the undefined property.
>
> Does this help you:
> http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=10063#p103256
>
> ?
>
Hi,
>But the
>737-300 fails C172P and others work.
I guess still the problem is is the undefined property.Does this help you:
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=10063#p103256?
Heiko
--
Increase Visibi
No Sir;
I do know it needed a "--aircraft=" but I checked on the net for things
XML/xml and came up with nothing of value. This is SuSE 11.4 M3 and it
still reads that error. I am updating a CVS/GIT type version,
recompiling Simgear (no help) and going to try FlightGear next. But the
737-30
Thorsten wrote
> -Original Message-
> From:.i.r...@jyu.fi [mailto:thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi]
> Sent: 24 November 2010 10:21
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Nonfunctional airplanes
>
> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and
thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> For what it's worth, the complete set of commandline options was
>
> --disable-fullscreen --geometry=800x600 --disable-real-weather-fetch
> --airport=TNCM --timeofday=noon --enable-auto-coordination
> --aircraft=
I'll try some of the aircraft using these settings.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Donn Washburn wrote:
> It also seems that the most recent fgdata (todays version) gives this error
> d...@m1l-susehs:~> fgfs aircraft=737-300
> Processing command line arguments
> Fatal error: Failed to open file
> at aircraft=737-300
> (received from SimGear XML
>> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
>> thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some
>> people.
> []
>> c182rg
>
> I just picked this one as a random item from your list and I'm happy to
> state that it runs and flies properly for me (rea
> Hansajet
Fixed.
Torsten
--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get sta
Le mercredi 24 novembre 2010 11:21:07, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi a écrit :
> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
> thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some people.
>
> I have not taken care to make sure the problem persists in more recent
Hi,
>I had the same result with the 737-300 back a while ago.
>It would take off and climb and then nosed into the ground
>All other planes I tried didn't act like that.
That's Pilot Error- just keep to the weigh, speed and flapssetting given in the
Help menu. Like in real life. Based on the re
I had the same result with the 737-300 back a while ago.
It would take off and climb and then nosed into the ground
All other planes I tried didn't act like that.
It also seems that the most recent fgdata (todays version) gives this error
d...@m1l-susehs:~> fgfs aircraft=737-300
Processing command
Hi,
I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some people.
I have not taken care to make sure the problem persists in more recent
pulls, and I have not tried to find out if a quirk in my system us
respon
thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
> thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some people.
[]
> c182rg
I just picked this one as a random item from your list and I'm happy to
state that it runs and flies pr
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
> thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some people.
>
> I have not taken care to make sure the problem persists in more recent
> pulls, and I have
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:21:07 +0200 (EET)
thorsten.i.renk wrote:
> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
> thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some people.
> lightning
In what way was the Lightning non-functional? I've certainly not had
26 matches
Mail list logo
