Re: [Flightgear-devel] PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029

2008-10-04 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Martin Spott -- Friday 03 October 2008: Maintaining this branch for such a long time, including the pile of work that had been spent to get the 1.0 release out, has been the biggest distraction and waste of developer resources since I'm monitoring this project Yeah, emphasis more on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029; Was: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS:

2008-10-04 Thread Erik Hofman
Let me emphrase that OSG is the way forward and there is no going back. Really. That said, I did some updates to the 1.0 branch to get it in sync with the base package in CVS. It really was a trivial task and took no more than a few minutes. Whether there will be a 1.1 release or not is not for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029;

2008-10-04 Thread Erik Hofman
Let me emphrase that OSG is the way forward and there is no going back. Really. That said, I did some updates to the 1.0 branch to get it in sync with the base package in CVS. It really was a trivial task and took no more than a few minutes. Whether there will be a 1.1 release or not is not