On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 07:29 +, Ron Jensen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 10:44 -0700, John Denker wrote:
But there may also be issues with the prop efficiency at ultra-low
airspeed (high blade angle of attack).
Low blade angle of attack? Increasing airspeed increases blade AoA
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, John Denker wrote:
Anybody who is tempted to look at this is reminded of the
output ... /output section at the end of c172p.xml
I have sometimes found it useful.
Does anybody know if/where this feature is documented?
It is documented in section 3.1.11 (starting at page
This reduces by an order of magnitude the amount of
adverse yaw _in cruising flight_ in the c172p.
This is much more realistic.
There is still a ton of adverse yaw during slow flight.
commit 74e59d6c9fb1eca08fb446c26c7b5d873c45b0ea
Author: John Denker j...@av8n.com
Date: Fri Dec 11
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 10:44 -0700, John Denker wrote:
On 12/03/2009 10:18 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I took the opportunity to check the PoH against the simulator
experience. While I didn't go as far as getting the OAT exactly
right, the errors I came across were fairly signficant (using
4 matches
Mail list logo
