Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wiki vs. Manual; Was: Forums?

2006-11-28 Thread Martin Spott
Pigeon wrote: > Agreed. I think a forum has advantages over say a mailing list. But > then having both might not do any good. It's as hard to argue whether > things should go into the wiki or the manual. That one is not really difficult to tell, as threre's a clear distinction. The Wiki is s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-28 Thread Dene
Curtis Olson wrote: > On 11/28/06, *Ron Jensen* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > And this is the biggest argument against forums. They're only > accessable when the server is up > > > This is similar with email lists ... you can only post and receive > postin

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-28 Thread Curtis Olson
On 11/28/06, Ron Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And this is the biggest argument against forums. They're only accessable when the server is up This is similar with email lists ... you can only post and receive postings when the list server is running and configured correctly, and unfortun

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-28 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:29:05 +1100, Pigeon wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >A backup communication method might be good, but I'm not keen at > >all on the idea of having to look two places for the same kind of > >content. My feeling is that it should be one or the other. > >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-28 Thread Ron Jensen
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 23:01 -0600, Curtis Olson wrote: > And I'm a moron and just wiped out the whole thing 2 seconds ago. Let > me try again ... thanks for your patience ... :-( > > Curt. And this is the biggest argument against forums. They're only accessable when the server is up and its imp

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-28 Thread Pigeon
>A backup communication method might be good, but I'm not keen at >all on the idea of having to look two places for the same kind of >content. My feeling is that it should be one or the other. Agreed. I think a forum has advantages over say a mailing list. But then having both mig

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-28 Thread Curtis Olson
And I'm a moron and just wiped out the whole thing 2 seconds ago. Let me try again ... thanks for your patience ... :-( Curt. On 11/28/06, Curtis Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm just fiddling around and anything can be changed, but here is a first whack. http://www.flightgear.org/f

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-28 Thread Curtis Olson
I'm just fiddling around and anything can be changed, but here is a first whack. http://www.flightgear.org/forums/ As Dave said we can setup any structure of categories and forums. Right now I've created one category with all the forum topics inside, but we could certainly split things out m

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-28 Thread John Wojnaroski
Curtis Olson wrote: > Now that I am hosting the FlightGear web site with a commercial > hosting service, it becomes quite easy to setup online "forums" using > phpBB2. > > I know our development culture is built around mailing lists. I'm > sure the FlightGear community will be decisively spl

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-28 Thread Jon S. Berndt
I know our development culture is built around mailing lists. I'm sure the FlightGear community will be decisively split between forums versus mailing lists if I ask people's preferences ... so I'm not expecting a consensus here. Is this anything that is worth exploring? Is it worth having bot

[Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-28 Thread Curtis Olson
Now that I am hosting the FlightGear web site with a commercial hosting service, it becomes quite easy to setup online "forums" using phpBB2. I know our development culture is built around mailing lists. I'm sure the FlightGear community will be decisively split between forums versus mailing lis

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Tracker Bug

2006-11-28 Thread Pigeon
>I think I found a bug in flight tracker, my flight path seems to zig >zag around to places I never flew? this does it in Firefox anyone else >get the same bug? > >[1]http://fgfs.i-net.hu/modules/fgtracker/index.php?FUNCT=FLIGHT&FLIGH >TID=8553 >It zigs off to around Vanua

[Flightgear-devel] Flight Tracker Bug

2006-11-28 Thread Forums Virgin Net
I think I found a bug in flight tracker, my flight path seems to zig zag around to places I never flew? this does it in Firefox anyone else get the same bug? http://fgfs.i-net.hu/modules/fgtracker/index.php?FUNCT=FLIGHT&FLIGHTID=8553 It zigs off to around Vanuatu then flips over to Brazil at cer

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG point lights

2006-11-28 Thread Tim Moore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Curtis Olson wrote: > What kind of performance change (better? worse?) did you observer? > > Thanks, > > Curt. > Well, not so great. At SFO at night in the UFO I see a decrease from about 60fps with the existing lights to 43 with the OSG version. I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Eurocopter EC 135 - some delay but....

2006-11-28 Thread Maik Justus
Hi Heiko, great work. Waiting for your cvs-update Maik Heiko Schulz schrieb am 27.11.2006 23:04: > ..netherless it will come! > > Hi, > > I wanted to get the Ec 135 to CVS yesterday, but some > days ago I had some ideas to to fix some problems I > had with. > > Now I'm working on textures -

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SenecaII OAT indicator patch: please revert

2006-11-28 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 17:08: > * Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 17:02: > > $ cvs diff -r1.3 -r1.2 SenecaII.xml > > > > This also removes Overhead.CockpitLightSwitch, > > StrobeInCloudsHull and many other things. What about (B)? > > Err ... it adds that back i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SenecaII OAT indicator patch: please revert

2006-11-28 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 17:02: > $ cvs diff -r1.3 -r1.2 SenecaII.xml > > This also removes Overhead.CockpitLightSwitch, > StrobeInCloudsHull and many other things. What about (B)? Err ... it adds that back in. But I assume that you have done that very change in your copy a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SenecaII OAT indicator patch: please revert

2006-11-28 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Torsten Dreyer -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 16:52: > > Could you please either > > (A) mention the file name and (if necessary) revision number, *or* > > (B) submit a patch that reverts whatever you want reverted > I choose (A) > Filename: SenecaII.xml > Current revision: 1.3 > Requested revision:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SenecaII OAT indicator patch: please revert

2006-11-28 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> Could you please either > (A) mention the file name and (if necessary) revision number, *or* > (B) submit a patch that reverts whatever you want reverted I choose (A) Filename: SenecaII.xml Current revision: 1.3 Requested revision: 1.2 The comment in the Log says: ...snip... Tom Markowitz: ...sn

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SenecaII OAT indicator patch: please revert

2006-11-28 Thread Stuart Buchanan
--- Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Torsten Dreyer -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:38: > > [...] due to a patch applied a few days ago. >^^^ ^^ > > May I kindly ask to revert this patch > > *Which* patch? > > Could you please either > (A) mention the file name an

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SenecaII OAT indicator patch: please revert

2006-11-28 Thread Alex Romosan
Melchior FRANZ writes: > * Torsten Dreyer -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:38: >> [...] due to a patch applied a few days ago. >^^^ ^^ >> May I kindly ask to revert this patch > > *Which* patch? the patch was committed on saturday by erik hofman: 3. Senec

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SenecaII OAT indicator patch: please revert

2006-11-28 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Torsten Dreyer -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:38: > [...] due to a patch applied a few days ago. ^^^ ^^ > May I kindly ask to revert this patch *Which* patch? Could you please either (A) mention the file name and (if necessary) revision number, *or* (B) s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Eurocopter EC 135 - some delay but....

2006-11-28 Thread Karsten Krispin
Hi Heiko, Am Montag, 27. November 2006 23:04 schrieb Heiko Schulz: > http://hoerbird.ho.funpic.de/flightgear/ec135.baypo.jpg Great work so far! But won't the german police change their color to blue in the near future? Greetings, Karsten --

[Flightgear-devel] SenecaII OAT indicator patch: please revert

2006-11-28 Thread Torsten Dreyer
Hi, I just noticed, that the outside air temperature indicator of the SenecaII was relocated due to a patch applied a few days ago. May I kindly ask to revert this patch to SenecaII.xml because of two reasons: 1. The indicator is now not longer attached to anything and it looks a bit odd to see

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Eurocopter EC 135 - some delay but....

2006-11-28 Thread Roberto Inzerillo
Very nice indeed :-) May we already download the work in progress package? If yes, where? Roberto - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to shar

[Flightgear-devel] OSG issue 'transparent SenecaII' fixed

2006-11-28 Thread Torsten Dreyer
I have fixed the transparent SenecaII to work with the osg and plib versions of fg. The problem was that the prop-discs were using the same material as many other surfaces. The prop-discs get partly transparent by texture and by animation dependend of the rpm. That made other surfaces transpare

Re: [Flightgear-devel] sending external fdm data in the form of UDPpackets

2006-11-28 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, umesh pandey wrote: After converting FGNetFDM structure(given in net_fdm.cxx) by using htonf,htond or htonl, do we need to convert the structure into char packets and send to FGFS. I am using FGFS 0.9.3. Hi! Well, when you have used hton*() on your struct it should (hopef

Re: [Flightgear-devel] sending external fdm data in the form of UDPpackets

2006-11-28 Thread umesh pandey
After converting FGNetFDM structure(given in net_fdm.cxx) by using htonf,htond or htonl, do we need to convert the structure into char packets and send to FGFS. I am using FGFS 0.9.3. On 11/24/06, Anders Gidenstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, umesh pandey wrote: > What is th

Re: [Flightgear-devel] recent spam on atlas-devel

2006-11-28 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Quoting Vassilii Khachaturov : > For some reason, recently the signal to noise ratio on the atlas-devel > list has diminished virtually to zero due to lots of spam. Can you > please restrict posting to subscribers only? Althougth I am an admin for the Atlas project, I don't have the password for

[Flightgear-devel] recent spam on atlas-devel

2006-11-28 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
For some reason, recently the signal to noise ratio on the atlas-devel list has diminished virtually to zero due to lots of spam. Can you please restrict posting to subscribers only? TIA, Vassilii - Take Surveys. Earn Cash.