1) Did you know that there are 8 different BRAVO intersections
in the database?
Until now there was no support in the code for this; all but
one of the entries was thrown away at the lowest level. There
was a comment in the code saying that fixing this was on the
TODO list.
Well, no
* Joacim Persson -- Tuesday 26 December 2006:
> In Aircraft/c172p/kap140.nas and the identical Aircraft/c182/kap140.nas,
> this is line 799. In Aircraft/pa-24-250/kap140.nas, it's line 840.
> Assigning roll-arm with "gs-arm" doesn't seem to make any sense, so I guess
> it's just a typo there.
>
>
Maik Justus wrote:
> I have a piece of a bk117 rotor blade. But how to get the performance
> data of the heli out of that?
By asking the piece nicely !? ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
Hey,
I think the tail and top side are finished:
http://users.skynet.be/Pensacola/f16_1.jpg
http://users.skynet.be/Pensacola/f16_2.jpg
--
Regards,
Paul 'Pensacola' Cardinaels
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Futu
What is the name of this tv show?
Certainly worth a lot of laughs!
On 1/10/07, Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Curtis Olson" wrote:
>
> > [...] I know another guy (Hi Jack) :-)
>
> http://foxtrot.mgras.net/static/HIJACK.mpg
>
> ;-)
>
> Martin.
> --
> Unix _IS_ user friendly -
"Douglas Campos" wrote:
> What is the name of this tv show?
I don't know anything about it - except this short sequence,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
-
Hallo,
I see a few people are working on a new c182 release. Which c182 model are you
working on? There are a lot out there. Is that right you are using the C182 RG
(1977) as a base?
Roberto
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http:/
--- Roberto Inzerillo wrote:
> Hallo,
> I see a few people are working on a new c182 release. Which c182 model
> are you working on? There are a lot out there. Is that right you are
> using the C182 RG (1977) as a base?
The current c182 models a C-182P, and all updates have been to that model.
J
> The current c182 models a C-182P, and all updates have been to that model.
>
> John Denker has suggested that a C-182 RG would be a good addition.
> However, this is very much on the drawing-board and would require
> significant effort - we currently don't have an FDM or model for such an
> effo
Hi,
I'm building the Tiger F-5E from the Patrouille Suisse. (Swiss Air Force
Acrobaticteam).
See the pictures:
http://home.zhwin.ch/~heerchr/BilderForum/Tiger0101.png
http://home.zhwin.ch/~heerchr/BilderForum/Tiger0102.png
http://home.zhwin.ch/~heerchr/BilderForum/Tiger0103.png
http://home.z
Hi Christion,
You are aware that the T-38 (which is avaibale already) is basically the
F-5 Tiger aircraft (the T38 is near the bottom):
http://www.flightgear.org/Downloads/aircraft/index.shtml
Looking at what you've done so far I think combining your 3d panel and
the T-38 exterior 3d model and
On 01/11/2007 10:58 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> John Denker has suggested that a C-182 RG would be a good addition.
I'm still interested in that. It would be tremendously useful as a
procedures trainer.
> However, this is very much on the drawing-board and would require
> significant effort -
Martin Spott a écrit :
Hi Martin,
> Would you please check if the model as presently in CVS works for you
> ?
Indeed I forgot some pieces here and there. I uploaded an archive with
the missing or modified files:
http://croo.murgl.org/fgfs/A-10/update-A-10-20070111.tgz
Also, could you
alexis bory wrote:
> Indeed I forgot some pieces here and there. I uploaded an archive with
> the missing or modified files:
Well done !
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
---
Martin Spott a écrit :
> alexis bory wrote:
>
> > Indeed I forgot some pieces here and there. I uploaded an archive
> > with the missing or modified files:
>
> Well done ! Martin.
eeek!!! I forgot another one:
http://croo.murgl.org/fgfs/A-10/A-10-canopy-lock.rgb
you just have the right to bea
Martin Spott a écrit :
> alexis bory wrote:
>
> > Indeed I forgot some pieces here and there. I uploaded an archive
> > with the missing or modified files:
>
> Well done ! Martin.
And another patch to revert too.
Thanks again, I will spend more time preparing next update!
Alexis
--
Index: Ai
I munged the code so that the routines that manage
the "fix" database (waypoints etc.) and
the "navaid" database
are now insensitive to the upper-case / lower-case distinction.
That is, the "RBX" VOR/DME is now equivalent to the "rbx" VOR/DME.
I have checked that all navaids and waypoints in
On the Seneca II model, the KX 165 radios are broken.
-- When I try to tune 116.0 I get 116.99
-- When I try to tune 111.7 I get 111.69
-- But you can't just say everything is off by 0.01 MHz, because
if I put in 116.01, I get 116.01. The 116.0 result is skipped,
i.e. avoided!
I imagine t
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 13:52 -0500, John Denker wrote:
> On 01/11/2007 10:58 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>
> > John Denker has suggested that a C-182 RG would be a good addition.
>
> I'm still interested in that. It would be tremendously useful as a
> procedures trainer.
>
> > However, this is ve
On 01/11/2007 10:58 PM, Ron Jensen wrote:
> Where is the gear lever?
It can be (barely) seen in this picture
http://www.air-pros.com/images/C182RG-Panel.jpg
It is a black kinda-wheel-shaped knob on the end of a lever.
It can be seen peeking out just below the pilot's yoke,
centered L/R on a v
> On the Seneca II model, the KX 165 radios are broken.
>
> -- When I try to tune 116.0 I get 116.99
> -- When I try to tune 111.7 I get 111.69
> -- But you can't just say everything is off by 0.01 MHz, because
> if I put in 116.01, I get 116.01. The 116.0 result is skipped,
> i.e. avoided!
> I stumbled across this http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0644140/L/
> It's a night shot of the real 182P panel. Maybe you're interested.
Nice one. Look at the attitude indicator!
Torsten
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influenc
22 matches
Mail list logo
