The radar implementation in AIBase.cxx makes the assumption that the radar
is fixed on the longitudinal axis of the model. (It also assumes rotations
and elevations are in the local horizontal and that the radar is at the
origin of the model.) The radar data are used to drive the target markers on
* Tatsuhiro Nishioka -- 6/23/2009 5:01 AM:
> I'm not so sure what it should look like, but at least it needs
> nil check for the property.
That would only be cosmetics and just hide the fact that the
METAR runway choosing code is now broken since Detlefs recent
changes. The METAR wind direction/st
Hi,
> I got a similar crash after observing wildly jumping AI Aircraft. I'm pretty
> sure the AI Traffic system is the culprit, but haven't really an idea why
> it's >misbehaving.
>Also, considering the fact that the AI Traffic system is considered to be
>depricated, I'm not sure how mich ti
Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2009, 14:25 +0200 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
> * Tatsuhiro Nishioka -- 6/23/2009 5:01 AM:
> > I'm not so sure what it should look like, but at least it needs
> > nil check for the property.
>
> That would only be cosmetics and just hide the fact that the
> METAR runway choosing
Hi,
On Sunday 14 June 2009 12:50:10 Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> it appears this commit broke the autostart feature of the 777. With it,
> the MFD are not lighting up.
> It's unfortunate because I am currently working on the ground radar.
Sorry, I did not notice that this belongs to me ...
Looking
Hi Tim,
On Saturday 20 June 2009 19:46:50 Tim Moore wrote:
> Actually, I am using osg::Vec3d and osg::Vec4d. I tend to view the SGVec
> types as redundant, but that's a personal preference. I don't mind using
> SGVec in the property system, but if I do that I would like to add an
> operator to SG
2009/6/23 Mathias Fröhlich
> Well, from my point of view. I would prefer to have these.
> The reason is to have something self contained here.
> Sure we already rely on osg at many places. But if I build an aplication on
> simgear, I hope to have simgear classes there. SGProperties are simgear
> c
Hi,
On Sunday 14 June 2009 12:50:10 Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> it appears this commit broke the autostart feature of the 777. With it,
> the MFD are not lighting up.
> It's unfortunate because I am currently working on the ground radar.
Should work again now.
Greetings
Mathias
Just commited a hack for envrionment_ctrl.cxx.
It now waits for the first METAR to arrive before proceeding with the
initialization sequence. This prevents the nasal-dir-initialized signal being
fired before a METAR has arrived.
I more and more like the idea of removing startup.nas and implent
- "Mathias Fröhlich" a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 14 June 2009 12:50:10 Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > it appears this commit broke the autostart feature of the 777. With
> it,
> > the MFD are not lighting up.
> > It's unfortunate because I am currently working on the ground
> radar.
> Should w
Rather long title, eh? :D
I'm getting an error with the Seneca II. "IndependenVar property,
ice/wing in Table definition is not defined."
That's all.
Even with debug logs, the rest of it is just JSBSim aerodynamic tables.
They stop in that error.
--
Can you print the last part of the log or anything that the console dumps -
that might help. Details! :-)
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: Victhor [mailto:victhor.fos...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 5:03 PM
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-
Thanks, Mathias , was worried that I migt have a bunch of modifying to do :)
Syd
--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourcefo
That's it. The rest of the log are just JSBSim tables.
2009/6/23, Jon S. Berndt :
> Can you print the last part of the log or anything that the console dumps -
> that might help. Details! :-)
>
> Jon
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Victhor [mailto:victhor.fos...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tues
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote:
> Rather long title, eh? :D
> I'm getting an error with the Seneca II. "IndependenVar property,
> ice/wing in Table definition is not defined."
> That's all.
> Even with debug logs, the rest of it is just JSBSim aerodynamic tables.
> They stop in that error.
It
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote:
> Btw Jon:
> Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees.
Here, too.
> I also think JSBSim in FlightGear is creating initfile.xml:s again, has
> anyone else seen that?
Yes, doi
16 matches
Mail list logo
