> There are 2 little things I moticied in the Seneca, I don't know if these
> are intentional :
Nope - they are bugs!
>
> -- the ki525a knobs do not light at night with the other instruments. Is it
> like this in real ? It makes it difficult to dial a heading/obs at night.
Fixed.
>
> -- whatever I
Alan Teeder
> RE: [Simgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/simgear/props props.cxx, 1.44,1.45
> props.hxx, 1.32, 1.33
>
> Sadly, props.hxx is still getting me errors with MSVC 2008 - see attached
> error log.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: Tim Moore [mailto:timo...@baron.flightgear.org
>
Thanks for the quick reply, and best wishes with the solution. Why oh why
are MS compliers so pernickety?
-Original Message-
From: Vivian Meazza [mailto:vivian.mea...@lineone.net]
Sent: 19 July 2009 09:19
To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Simgear-cv
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:27:57 +0100, Alan wrote in message
<5fe353c04d92459a9dbf8d42d1b97...@ajtmain>:
> Thanks for the quick reply, and best wishes with the solution. Why oh
> why are MS compliers so pernickety?
..business strategy:
http://grokdoc.net/index.php/Dirty_Tricks_history#C.2B.2B
http
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:27:57 +0100, Alan wrote in message
> <5fe353c04d92459a9dbf8d42d1b97...@ajtmain>:
>
> > Thanks for the quick reply, and best wishes with the solution. Why oh
> > why are MS compliers so pernickety?
>
> ..business strateg
It is one thing to bring out a new software tool, in this case a compiler,
that enables the use of new technologies (.NET for example), but to
completely disregard the principles of backwards compatibility, forcing
software to be extensively re-written, is another.
_
From: Curtis Olson
cl.exe which compiles C and C++ has nothing in common with the CLR compiler
(.NET).
Unrelated issues, and what Curtis said : a bit of perspective, gcc is NOT
100% compliant either.
The issue has to do with standards compliance and C++ idioms, not MS
business strategy
Funny how any sense of perspect
Sorry folks, I seem to have started a flame war. This is not the right
place.
Alan
_
From: Nicolas Quijano [mailto:nquij...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 July 2009 17:23
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re:
[Flightgear-devel][Simgear-cvslogs]CVS:source/simgear/propsprops.cxx,
Sorry about calling you clueless, btw, I mistakenly thought your post was
from the same person who linked to the propaganda bullshit site on MS : I'm
no fan of MS, but I'm tired of falsehoods being used to critique them.
Especially as all those examples were null or so badly distorted to be
absolut
No problems.
My code-writing skills are even worse than they were when I retired. Once
upon a time I thought that I had the hang of C++, but these days I think
that I must have been mistaken.
_
From: Nicolas Quijano [mailto:nquij...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 July 2009 17:44
To: FlightGe
> Thanks for pointing these out.
>
> Torsten
Thank you ! Now , to work these SID/STARs :)
--
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors su
Alan,
Tim's fixes are now in CVS although not quite finished: you might have to
add NOMINMAX to your pre-processor definitions.
I'd be interested to hear how you get on.
Vivian
-Original Message-
From: Alan Teeder [mailto:ajtee...@v-twin.org.uk]
Sent: 19 July 2009 17:52
To:
Hi
This afternoon I went to a very nice meeting at Couhé Verac in France, plenty
of nice old planes :)
Back home I tried to see how it looks in FG, and I found it with an error in
the filed dimensions.
http://imagebin.org/56447
left is generated by brisa's airport painter, right is the offic
Tim Moore wrote:
> Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With yesterdays checkin from Tim we need a more or less recent osg version
>> to
>> build flightgear. Tim promised to provide come conditional code to work
>> around
>> that.
>>
>> But I would suggest to just have a somehow recent osg
And I forgot - you need to change #include to
#include in props.cxx
-Original Message-
From: Vivian Meazza [mailto:vivian.mea...@lineone.net]
Sent: 19 July 2009 23:47
To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
Subject: Re:
[Flightgear-devel][Simgear-cvslogs]CVS:source/simgear/propsprops
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:22:49 -0400, Nicolas wrote in message
<808354800907190922n4853debbv75b7ebaaa3100...@mail.gmail.com>:
> The issue has to do with standards compliance and C++ idioms,
> not MS business strategy
..Microsoft has _all_ the resources it might ever need to get
their own compile
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:43:41 -0400, Nicolas wrote in message
<808354800907190943ic2f7c59g389bedc9eb3f1...@mail.gmail.com>:
> Sorry about calling you clueless, btw, I mistakenly thought your post
> was from the same person who linked to the propaganda bullshit site
..you refer to http://grokdoc.n
dave perry wrote:
> I am getting segmentation fault after updating osg trunk from svn,
> SimGear from cvs, and fgfs source from cvs. I also tried compiling
> against osg-2.8.2-rc4. I still get a segmentation fault right after
> "loading aircraft" completes.
Can you send me a backtrace?
Than
18 matches
Mail list logo
