Before going into more detail, you might want to check with Mathias'
recent work to integrate space-view into FlightGear. Otherwise you'll
probably be doing duplicate work.
Well, if Mathias could simply comment on the issue? What can we expect at what
timescale? (And how do you know these
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Good Evening,
Ok, no feedback to my comments here except Martin who tells me that the
current checked in version behaves as expected.
Hi,
I have not had time to consider the proposal carefully, but I agree that
the ocean tiles are problematic
Hi,
after adding some proper error messages in the texture loader, I do see
a number of missing texture files being reported. And they don't seem to
be in fgdata. Anyone knows what's wrong here? Missing files or broken
models/effects referring to incorrect files?
Cannot find texture
Renk Thorsten wrote:
Before going into more detail, you might want to check with Mathias'
recent work to integrate space-view into FlightGear. Otherwise you'll
probably be doing duplicate work.
Well, if Mathias could simply comment on the issue? What can we
expect at what timescale?
I'd
Anders Gidenstam wrote:
While the (old) new behaviour is as Martin expects it is not what most
that has read Docs/README.scenery would expect (I'd think). However, I
would not consider Docs/README.scenery a normative source (i.e. not how
it should be but rather how it was) - but Martin's
Looks like some i missed.I converted most of the textures to winter
versions long ago,and cant remember if I just missed those or they
didn't exist at the time.I see a sand.png, maybe it would make more
sense to change the material.xml file to use that one sand.png texture
for winter scenes. I can
ah the golfcourse winter texture is there , just misnamed in the
material.xml file
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 3:20 PM, syd adams adams@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like some i missed.I converted most of the textures to winter
versions long ago,and cant remember if I just missed those or they
didn't
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net wrote:
Anders Gidenstam wrote:
While the (old) new behaviour is as Martin expects it is not what most
that has read Docs/README.scenery would expect (I'd think). However, I
would not consider Docs/README.scenery a normative
8 matches
Mail list logo
